International journal of STD & AIDS · 2026
The waiting room: Unmet sexual health service needs among men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men in England, findings from an online, cross-sectional community survey in 2024.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ogaz Dana, Mullen Dolores, Baldry George, Jayes Danielle, Phillips Dawn, Lowndes Catherine M, Reid David, Charlesworth Jordan, Buitendam Erna, Phillips David, Hughes Gwenda, Mercer Catherine H, Saunders John, Folkard Kate, Sinka Katy, Mohammed Hamish
Аннотация
BackgroundSexual health service (SHS) delivery in England shifted substantially with rapid expansion of online services during the COVID-19 pandemic. While digital services may improve reach, limited data exist on unmet need for in-person SHS in England, especially among men and gender-diverse individuals who have sex with men, key populations disproportionately affected by sexual health inequalities.MethodsWe analysed data from "Reducing inequalities in Sexual Health" (RiiSH) 2024 (Nov/Dec 2024), an online survey of UK-resident men and gender-diverse individuals having sex with men. We assessed in-person SHS access and unmet need (tried but failed to access a SHS in-person) over the past year. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations with unmet need.ResultsAmong 2404 participants living in England (median age 45 years, 88% White, 95% cisgender), 86% had ever accessed in-person SHS and 59% in the past year. Of those who tried to access in-person care in the past year, 12% (95% CI: 11%-14%) experienced unmet need, especially Outside London (15% vs 8% in London). Common barriers included unavailable (50%) or inconvenient (41%) appointment times. In adjusted multivariable analysis, unmet need continued to be lower among participants living in London (aOR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.44-0.92]), those financially comfortable (aOR: 0.69 [0.49-0.97]), and those reporting ≥1 marker(s) of sexual risk (e.g. HIV-PrEP use in the last year and/or in the last 3-4 months, the report of a bacterial STI diagnosis, engaging in chemsex, having had ≥10 male physical sex partners; aOR: 0.14 [0.10-0.20]). Unmet need was higher among participants with limiting long-term physical health conditions (aOR: 1.61 [1.12-2.30]) and those who reported ever using online postal self-sampling services for STI testing (OPSS) (aOR: 1.50 [1.07-2.09]).ConclusionsDespite high SHS engagement, one-in-eight reported unmet need for in-person SHS. Local service delivery guided by joint strategic needs assessments could help address unmet need for SHS.