MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12890-025-04030-z

Медицинская библиотека · BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025

Consolidation-to-ground-glass opacity ratio on chest CT as a prognostic marker for critical outcomes in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Tanaka Hiromu, Tanabe Naoya, Chubachi Shotaro, Maetani Tomoki, Shiraishi Yusuke, Namkoong Ho, Asakura Takanori, Shimada Takashi, Azekawa Shuhei, Otake Shiro, Nakagawara Kensuke, Fukushima Takahiro, Watase Mayuko, Terai Hideki, Sasaki Mamoru, Ueda Soichiro, Kato Yukari, Harada Norihiro, Suzuki Shoji, Yoshida Shuichi, Tateno Hiroki, Yamada Yoshitake, Jinzaki Masahiro, Hirai Toyohiro, Okada Yukinori, Koike Ryuji, Ishii Makoto, Hasegawa Naoki, Kimura Akinori, Imoto Seiya, Miyano Satoru, Ogawa Seishi, Kanai Takanori, Fukunaga Koichi

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT)-based quantification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is widely performed, and total pneumonia volume, ground-glass opacity (GGO), and consolidation affect disease severity. However, there is insufficient information on how consolidation to GGO (C/G) ratio correlates with clinical characteristics including disease severity and complications in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 1,194 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from four member hospitals of the Japan COVID-19 Task Force. Critical outcomes were defined as conditions requiring high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation, or death. Patients were divided into two groups based on %pneumonia (percentage of pneumonia volume divided by total lung volume) using receiver operating characteristic curve, and those with high %pneumonia were further divided into two groups based on C/G ratio. Critical outcomes and complications were then compared between high and low C/G ratio groups.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value of %pneumonia to predict critical outcomes was 17.1%, classifying the included patients into low (Group 1, n = 900) and high (n = 294) %pneumonia groups. The optimal cutoff value of C/G ratio was 0.202, classifying patients in the high %pneumonia group into two groups: low (Group 2, n = 192) and high C/G (Group 3, n = 102) ratio groups. The incidence of critical outcomes was stair-step high in all three groups (2.1%, 21.4%, and 37.3%, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed an independent relationship between C/G ratio and critical outcomes from other known risk factors (adjusted odds ratio: 1.92, 95% confidential interval: 1.03-3.59, P = 0.040). Group 3 also showed significantly higher serum C-reactive protein (Group 1: 2.96 mg/dL, Group 2: 8.90 mg/dL, Group 3: 11.4 mg/dL) and procalcitonin (Group 1: 0.16 ng/mL, Group 2: 0.25 ng/mL, Group 3: 1.19 ng/mL) levels and incidence of bacterial infection (Group 1: 5.6%, Group 2: 10.4%, Group 3: 20.3%), compared with other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-density analysis of COVID-19 pneumonia in a large patient population showed that C/G ratio was a significant predictor of critical outcomes and useful for prognosis evaluation.

Для цитирования: Tanaka Hiromu, Tanabe Naoya, Chubachi Shotaro, Maetani Tomoki, Shiraishi Yusuke, Namkoong Ho, Asakura Takanori, Shimada Takashi, Azekawa Shuhei, Otake Shiro, Nakagawara Kensuke, Fukushima Takahiro, Watase Mayuko, Terai Hideki, Sasaki Mamoru, Ueda Soichiro, Kato Yukari, Harada Norihiro, Suzuki Shoji, Yoshida Shuichi, Tateno Hiroki, Yamada Yoshitake, Jinzaki Masahiro, Hirai Toyohiro, Okada Yukinori, Koike Ryuji, Ishii Makoto, Hasegawa Naoki, Kimura Akinori, Imoto Seiya, Miyano Satoru, Ogawa Seishi, Kanai Takanori, Fukunaga Koichi. Consolidation-to-ground-glass opacity ratio on chest CT as a prognostic marker for critical outcomes in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.. BMC pulmonary medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-025-04030-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.