Virology journal · 2025
The establishment of a universal standard for both viral antigen and nucleid acid detection based on digital PCR.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Manyu, Yang Siyuan, Ma Tingting, Abulikemu Alimire, Zhang Chunlei, Cheng Xun, Li Jing, Lu Jia, Wang Pengfei, Guo Yong, Liu Donglai, Wang Linghang, Zhou Haiwei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Viral antigen rapid detection tests (Ag-RDTs) and PCR-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are essential for diagnosing infections like SARS-CoV-2. However, unlike nucleic acids which can be quantified precisely in copies, viral antigens lack a standardized unit of measurement, hindering precise analytical evaluation of Ag-RDTs and comparison with NAATs.
METHODS: We established a universal national standard for SARS-CoV-2 antigen and nucleic acid based on an Omicron BA.1 strain, inactivated using β-propiolactone (BPL). Its concentration was assigned via multi-laboratory digital PCR (dPCR). Clinical samples were tested with Ag-RDTs and NAATs. We also compared the impact of heat and BPL inactivation on detection using dPCR, qPCR, and sequencing. The standard was then used to evaluate the limits of detection (LoDs) of commercial Ag-RDTs and NAATs using a common unitage.
RESULTS: Clinical samples' results showed that antigen positivity was correlated with higher nucleic acid titers. Both BPL inactivation and heat inactivation maintained comparable nucleic acid titers, but BPL inactivation preserved better antigen activity. The national standard concentration was assigned as 1.04 × 108 Unit/mL (standard uncertainty: 3.48 × 106 Unit/mL). Using this standard, NAATs exhibited lower LoDs than Ag-RDTs, though some Ag-RDT sensitivity approached NAAT levels. Most commercial assays met or exceeded their claimed LoDs, with all claimed NAAT LoDs falling within 2-fold of measured values. The standard enabled direct cross-format LoD comparison.
CONCLUSION: We established and validated a BPL-inactivated universal national standard specifically designed to overcome the difficulties in quantifying antigen and enabling direct sensitivity comparison between SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDTs and NAATs.
METHODS: We established a universal national standard for SARS-CoV-2 antigen and nucleic acid based on an Omicron BA.1 strain, inactivated using β-propiolactone (BPL). Its concentration was assigned via multi-laboratory digital PCR (dPCR). Clinical samples were tested with Ag-RDTs and NAATs. We also compared the impact of heat and BPL inactivation on detection using dPCR, qPCR, and sequencing. The standard was then used to evaluate the limits of detection (LoDs) of commercial Ag-RDTs and NAATs using a common unitage.
RESULTS: Clinical samples' results showed that antigen positivity was correlated with higher nucleic acid titers. Both BPL inactivation and heat inactivation maintained comparable nucleic acid titers, but BPL inactivation preserved better antigen activity. The national standard concentration was assigned as 1.04 × 108 Unit/mL (standard uncertainty: 3.48 × 106 Unit/mL). Using this standard, NAATs exhibited lower LoDs than Ag-RDTs, though some Ag-RDT sensitivity approached NAAT levels. Most commercial assays met or exceeded their claimed LoDs, with all claimed NAAT LoDs falling within 2-fold of measured values. The standard enabled direct cross-format LoD comparison.
CONCLUSION: We established and validated a BPL-inactivated universal national standard specifically designed to overcome the difficulties in quantifying antigen and enabling direct sensitivity comparison between SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDTs and NAATs.