Scientific reports · 2026
Clinical risk-aware reinforcement learning for latency-constrained healthcare IoT scheduling.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jumah Jawaher Abdullah Bin, Mirghani Hyder Osman, Alateeq Saad, Algahtani Muidh Awadh, Althubyani Bushra Yousef, Alsaadi Naif, Abdallah Aisha, Alazzam Malik Bader
Аннотация
The rapid growth of the Healthcare Internet of Things (HIoT) has enabled continuous, real-time patient monitoring through wearable and bedside devices. These systems generate time-sensitive physiological data that are essential for the early detection of critical conditions such as arrhythmias and hypoxia. However, conventional cloud-centric architectures introduce significant end-to-end latency, which can compromise timely clinical response in safety-critical scenarios. Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) mitigates this limitation by bringing computation closer to data sources; yet, existing scheduling approaches remain largely system-centric and do not adequately incorporate patient-specific clinical risk into their decision-making. To address this gap, this paper presents CRAI-LCS, a clinical risk-aware Reinforcement learning (RL) framework for latency-constrained scheduling in HIoT systems. Unlike prior simulation-driven studies, CRAI-LCS integrates real physiological data from the PhysioNet MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database to construct realistic, data-driven workloads. Specifically, electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are segmented into time-windowed tasks with clinically grounded characteristics, including input size, computational demand, and urgency-aware deadlines. The framework combines data-driven clinical risk estimation, deadline-violation prediction, and RL-based scheduling to dynamically prioritize high-risk tasks while efficiently managing system resources. Experimental results demonstrate that CRAI-LCS consistently outperforms baseline approaches in terms of latency, deadline compliance, and resource utilization under realistic workload conditions. Ablation studies further confirm the individual contributions of the clinical risk-awareness and predictive scheduling components. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of incorporating real physiological data into scheduling design, providing a more reliable and clinically relevant foundation for next-generation healthcare edge intelligence systems.