Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fong Yuman, Raptis Dimitri A, Kavoussi Louis, Wren Sherry M, Fowler Dennis, Anvari Mehran, Bianco Francesco, Liang Xiao, Li Zheyong, Yin Xiaoyu, Piccoli Micaela, Aldousari Saad, Marks John, Shen Baiyong, Ko Clifford, Ruurda Jelle, Seeliger Barbara, Hagendoorn Jeroen, Essani Rahila, Walsh R Matthew, Oleynikov Dmitry, Jones Stephanie B, Bindal Vivek, Kim Hyun Koo, Hyung Woo Jin, Melstrom Laleh, Hashimoto Daniel, Celotto Francesco, Chen Liaohai Leo, Burt Bryan M, Lafaro Kelly, Elli Fernando, Kudsi Yusef, Ratti Francesca, Wilson Erik, Bianchi Paolo Pietro, Morgan Annette, Bartlett Stephen T, Rashidi Laila, Yu Liu, Gawkins Bill, Hinoul Piet, Peine Bill, Woo Yanghee, Raoof Mustafa, Jones Daniel, Deshpande Supriya, Bernard Jordana, Wang Yulun, Broering Dieter C, Giulianotti Pier Cristoforo
Аннотация
METHODS: The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non-expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day-long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines.
RESULTS: Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico-legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations).
CONCLUSIONS: There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.