Endoscopy · 2026
Feasibility and safety of an adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm guided by the muscle-retracting sign for early rectal cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sorge Andrea, Argenziano Maria Eva, Poortmans Pieter Jan, Montori Michele, Tornai Tamas, Hoorens Anne, Debels Lynn K, Savarino Edoardo Vincenzo, Desomer Lobke, Tate David J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic and radiological staging of early rectal cancer (ERC) remains suboptimal, contributing to inaccurate treatment allocation and the risk of under- and overtreatment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Pocket-detection method with Real-time Intraprocedural Muscle-retracting sign Evaluation (PRIME) resection algorithm for ERC.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective registry of rectal lesions managed according to the PRIME algorithm between August 2023 and October 2025. The muscle-retracting sign (MRS) status guided adaptive dissection plane selection: endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) if MRS negative; endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) or full-thickness resection (knife-assisted [kFTR] or device-assisted [FTRD]) for MRS-positive lesions. Primary outcomes were technical success and the rate of R0 endoscopic resection. The secondary outcomes were the technical success of deep-margin optical diagnosis and adverse events.
RESULTS: 47 lesions were included. MRS prevalence was 34.0% (16/47). Technical success of endoscopic resection was 97.9% (46/47; 95%CI 88.7%-99.9%). ESD was performed in 31 lesions, EID in nine, kFTR in five, and FTRD in one. R0 resection was achieved in 89.1% (41/46; 95%CI 76.4%-96.4%) and R0 vertical margin in 95.7% (44/46; 95%CI 85.2%-99.5%). Technical success of deep-margin optical diagnosis was 100% (47/47; 95%CI 92.5%-100%). Nonsevere (AGREE classification grade I-IIIa) adverse events occurred in 10.6% of patients (5/47; 95%CI 3.5%-23.1%).
CONCLUSION: The MRS-guided adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm (PRIME) was feasible and safe for ERC achieving high R0 rates. These findings support its validation in larger studies with longer follow-up.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective registry of rectal lesions managed according to the PRIME algorithm between August 2023 and October 2025. The muscle-retracting sign (MRS) status guided adaptive dissection plane selection: endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) if MRS negative; endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) or full-thickness resection (knife-assisted [kFTR] or device-assisted [FTRD]) for MRS-positive lesions. Primary outcomes were technical success and the rate of R0 endoscopic resection. The secondary outcomes were the technical success of deep-margin optical diagnosis and adverse events.
RESULTS: 47 lesions were included. MRS prevalence was 34.0% (16/47). Technical success of endoscopic resection was 97.9% (46/47; 95%CI 88.7%-99.9%). ESD was performed in 31 lesions, EID in nine, kFTR in five, and FTRD in one. R0 resection was achieved in 89.1% (41/46; 95%CI 76.4%-96.4%) and R0 vertical margin in 95.7% (44/46; 95%CI 85.2%-99.5%). Technical success of deep-margin optical diagnosis was 100% (47/47; 95%CI 92.5%-100%). Nonsevere (AGREE classification grade I-IIIa) adverse events occurred in 10.6% of patients (5/47; 95%CI 3.5%-23.1%).
CONCLUSION: The MRS-guided adaptive endoscopic resection algorithm (PRIME) was feasible and safe for ERC achieving high R0 rates. These findings support its validation in larger studies with longer follow-up.