The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026
Water cooling to prevent electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhipeng Qi, Bing Li, Dongli He, Qiang Shi, Zhong Ren, Shilun Cai, Mingyan Cai, Peiyao Fu, Yangbei Zhu, Liang Zhu, Enpan Xu, Yunshi Zhong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: With the increasing frequency of electrocoagulation hemostasis used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the incidence of postoperative bleeding is gradually decreasing, while the incidence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PECS) is gradually increasing. Water cooling can reduce thermal injury to the intestinal wall after electrocoagulation. Therefore, this study intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial to explore the effectiveness of water cooling after electrocoagulation in reducing the occurrence of PECS.
METHODS: From November 2022 to October 2023, 420 patients were prospectively included. The patients were 1:1 randomly divided into two groups, named the standard ESD (S-ESD) group and the water-cooled ESD (W-ESD) group. The main outcome measure was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes were ESD operative time, complete resection rates, and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The incidence of PECS in the W-ESD group was significantly lower than that in the S-ESD group (7.6% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.003). The median operation time was also shorter in the W-ESD group than in the S-ESD group (37.0 minutes, IQR: 30.0-47.0 minutes vs 42.5 minutes, IQR: 33.0-60.0 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in specimen size between the two groups (3.8cm2, IQR: 3.1-6.3cm2 vs 4.6cm2, IQR: 3.1-7.1cm2, P = 0.286), and the complete resection rate was 100%. No perforation occurred in any patient.
CONCLUSION: Water-cooled ESD technology can significantly reduce the occurrence of PECS.
METHODS: From November 2022 to October 2023, 420 patients were prospectively included. The patients were 1:1 randomly divided into two groups, named the standard ESD (S-ESD) group and the water-cooled ESD (W-ESD) group. The main outcome measure was the incidence of PECS. Secondary outcomes were ESD operative time, complete resection rates, and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The incidence of PECS in the W-ESD group was significantly lower than that in the S-ESD group (7.6% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.003). The median operation time was also shorter in the W-ESD group than in the S-ESD group (37.0 minutes, IQR: 30.0-47.0 minutes vs 42.5 minutes, IQR: 33.0-60.0 minutes, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in specimen size between the two groups (3.8cm2, IQR: 3.1-6.3cm2 vs 4.6cm2, IQR: 3.1-7.1cm2, P = 0.286), and the complete resection rate was 100%. No perforation occurred in any patient.
CONCLUSION: Water-cooled ESD technology can significantly reduce the occurrence of PECS.