MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-026-12977-1

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2026

Comparison of learning curves and cross-over effects using articulating laparoscopic instruments versus standard laparoscopic instruments.

Bereuter Jean-Paul, Malpica Maximiliano Emmanuel Ceron, Geissler Mark Enrik, Runge Josephine, Hasanovic Jasmin, Selbmann Anne, Geissler Rona Berit, Krause-Jüttler Grit, Kern Alexander, Weitz Jürgen, Distler Marius, von Bechtolsheim Felix, Dobroschke Jakob, Oehme Florian

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery evolves continuously with novel tools complementing standard laparoscopic instruments (SLI). Articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) provide enhanced dexterity resembling robotic systems while remaining more affordable and accessible. However, comparative data on their learning curve and performance are limited. This study investigated ALI training and performance in a controlled simulator setting.

METHODS

Fifty-three medical students participated. After baseline measurement, all participants underwent the same modified Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) training curriculum but were randomized in either using ALI or SLI. Learning curves were tracked for the Peg transfer and suture and knot tasks until a predefined proficiency level was reached. All participants then completed final assessments using both instrument types. The primary endpoint was peak force; secondary endpoints included instrument motion metrics, task time, error rate, and SURG-TLX workload scores.

RESULTS

The ALI group demonstrated a slower learning curve in the Peg transfer task compared to the SLI group based on task time (p < 0.001), peak force (p = 0.02), and path length (p < 0.001). In the final assessment, peak force was comparable between groups (Peg: p = 0.17; Suture: p = 0.28), while ALI use resulted in greater path length (Peg: p < 0.001; Suture: p = 0.01) and longer task time (p < 0.001). Error rates and SURG-TLX scores did not differ. In the crossover assessment, prior ALI training resulted in comparable results for SLI for most parameters, including peak force (Peg: p = 0.97, suture: p = 0.05), instrument speed (Peg: p = 0.13, suture: p = 0.27) or error rate (Peg: p = 0.06; suture: p = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

Although ALI require a longer learning curve, training with these instruments transfers effectively to standard laparoscopic skills. Their robotic-like motion and accessibility support incorporating ALI into surgical education.

Для цитирования: Bereuter Jean-Paul, Malpica Maximiliano Emmanuel Ceron, Geissler Mark Enrik, Runge Josephine, Hasanovic Jasmin, Selbmann Anne, Geissler Rona Berit, Krause-Jüttler Grit, Kern Alexander, Weitz Jürgen, Distler Marius, von Bechtolsheim Felix, Dobroschke Jakob, Oehme Florian. Comparison of learning curves and cross-over effects using articulating laparoscopic instruments versus standard laparoscopic instruments.. Surgical endoscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-026-12977-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.