MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/den.70198

Медицинская библиотека · Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026

Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

El-Sayed Ahmed, Geelani Syed, El-Sayed Sherif, Choudry Hassan Ali, Lovat Laurence B, Ahmad Omer F

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing rapidly in gastrointestinal endoscopy, offering new opportunities to enhance diagnostic accuracy, procedure quality, and clinical efficiency. However, its integration into practice raises a range of complex challenges. This review identifies the central ethical, legal, and practical concerns in AI adoption, including data governance, patient safety, and the growing complexity of accountability as systems become more autonomous. Bias and limited transparency in model development risk worsening health inequalities, while human-AI interaction introduces concerns such as overreliance and deskilling. Generative AI adds further uncertainty, producing outputs that are difficult to predict or explain. Ensuring responsible implementation will require strong governance, inclusive design, and meaningful human oversight. As these technologies become more embedded in clinical care, ongoing examination of their risks and impacts will be essential to ensure the appropriate balance between innovation and safety.

Для цитирования: El-Sayed Ahmed, Geelani Syed, El-Sayed Sherif, Choudry Hassan Ali, Lovat Laurence B, Ahmad Omer F. Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.. Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/den.70198.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.