DOI 10.1080/08941939.2026.2668806
Development and Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of a Multifunctional Operative Support Arm in Reproductive Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate short-term clinical outcomes, surgeon-reported fatigue, and staff user experience associated with a multifunctional operative support arm in reproductive laparoscopic surgery.
DESIGN
Single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.
SETTING
Tertiary university-affiliated reproductive medicine center.
PATIENTS: One hundred women aged 25-40 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery for stage I pelvic endometriosis, hydrosalpinx, or benign ovarian cysts.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to surgery using the multifunctional operative support arm or a conventional passive support condition.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was surgeon-reported fatigue assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes included staff satisfaction and device-related comfort. Clinical outcomes included operative duration, postoperative infection, length of stay, anti-Müllerian hormone, and antral follicle count.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Operative duration, length of stay, postoperative infection, and ovarian reserve indicators did not differ significantly. Mixed-effects analysis of 550 surgeon and 450 nurse evaluations showed lower surgeon fatigue with the device than with conventional support (-0.66, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.54; p < 0.001). Ventilation, temperature control, and comfort scores were also higher, although satisfaction differences were small.
CONCLUSION
The device improved staff-reported ergonomic comfort without adverse short-term clinical effects, but confirmation with objective measures is needed.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.