MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/08927790261451032

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endourology · 2026

Comparative Analysis of A Novel Air-Bubble Guided Percutaneous Access Technique Against Traditional Fluoroscopic Techniques.

Gao Bruce M, Sims Harel C, Ong Ian, Madamba Kriselle, Saadat Seyedamirvala, Badin-Castro Jonathan, Ali Aymon, O'Leary Mitchell, Schneider Douglas, Daneshvar Michael, Cwikla Daniel, Patel Roshan M, Landman Jamie, Clayman Ralph V, Jiang Pengbo

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) requires precise renal access, a feat that is often challenging and time-consuming. In this light, we evaluated the bubble needle, a standard nephrostomy needle with an integrated two-dimensional bubble level designed to maintain anterior-posterior alignment after a single fluoroscopic image. We hypothesized that the bubble needle would streamline access while providing accuracy comparable to conventional fluoroscopic techniques and substantially reduced radiation exposure.

METHODS

Twenty-one participants (students = 9, residents = 5, attendings = 7) each performed, in random sequence, three punctures using traditional bull's-eye, rotated bull's-eye, and bubble needle techniques in a ballistic gel PCNL phantom with a radiopaque target at 10 cm depth. Outcomes were fluoroscopy dose milligray (mGy), fluoroscopy time (s), procedure time (s), and accuracy (mm). Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and mixed-effects models, adjusting for experience and trial number.

RESULTS

A total of 189 punctures were completed. Bubble needle achieved the lowest radiation dose and exposure time (0.23 ± 0.19 mGy; 6.90 ± 5.40 seconds), representing 74%/70% reductions vs traditional and 57%/54% vs rotated (p < 0.001). Mean procedure time (s) was significantly lower for bubble needle compared to the traditional technique (31.40 ± 13.71 s vs 40.46 ± 22.67 s; p = 0.008) and for rotated compared to traditional technique (25.22 ± 12.34 s vs 40.46 ± 22.67 s; p < 0.001). Mean accuracy (mm) was not significantly different among traditional, rotated, and bubble needle techniques (2.3 ± 3.4 mm vs 1.2 ± 2.7 mm vs 1.5 ± 1.5 mm; p = 0.077). Results were consistent across experience levels, with no significant learning effect across trials.

CONCLUSION

The bubble needle maintains accuracy comparable to conventional fluoroscopic techniques while decreasing procedure time and reducing radiation exposure by more than half.

Для цитирования: Gao Bruce M, Sims Harel C, Ong Ian, Madamba Kriselle, Saadat Seyedamirvala, Badin-Castro Jonathan, Ali Aymon, O'Leary Mitchell, Schneider Douglas, Daneshvar Michael, Cwikla Daniel, Patel Roshan M, Landman Jamie, Clayman Ralph V, Jiang Pengbo. Comparative Analysis of A Novel Air-Bubble Guided Percutaneous Access Technique Against Traditional Fluoroscopic Techniques.. Journal of endourology. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/08927790261451032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.