DOI 10.1007/s11548-026-03695-z
SurgViVQA: temporally grounded video question answering for surgical scene understanding.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Video question answering (VideoQA) in the surgical domain aims to enhance intraoperative understanding by enabling AI models to reason over temporally coherent events rather than isolated frames. Current approaches are limited to static image features, and available datasets often lack temporal annotations, ignoring the dynamics critical for accurate procedural interpretation.
METHODS
We propose SurgViVQA, a surgical VideoQA model that extends visual reasoning from static images to dynamic surgical scenes. It uses a Masked Video-Text Encoder to fuse video and question features, capturing temporal cues like motion and tool-tissue interactions, which a fine-tuned LLM then decodes into coherent answers. To evaluate its performance, we curate REAL-Colon-VQA, a colonoscopic video dataset including motion questions and diagnostic attributes, including out-of-template questions with rephrased or semantically altered formulations to evaluate model robustness.
RESULTS
Experimental validation on REAL-Colon-VQA and the public EndoVis18-VQA dataset shows that SurgViVQA outperforms existing image-based VQA benchmark models and remains competitive with a fine-tuned video VLM baseline. In particular, SurgViVQA improves over PitVQA by +9% on REAL-Colon-VQA and +9% on EndoVis18-VQA in Keyword Accuracy, while achieving the strongest overall lexical and semantic generation performance. A perturbation study on the questions further confirms improved generalizability and robustness to variations in question phrasing.
CONCLUSION
SurgViVQA and the REAL-Colon-VQA dataset provide a framework for temporally aware understanding in surgical VideoQA, enabling AI models to interpret dynamic procedural contexts.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.