MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12094-026-04394-6

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026

Robotic vs. laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in high BMI patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Chengzheng, Zhou Huaicheng

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and oncologic results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries in patients with high BMI.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted under the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 2025 for studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries among patients with BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2. Five studies included data for 700 cases in the robotic group (RG) and 2102 cases in the laparoscopic group (LG). The main areas of outcome investigations included operative time, length of hospital stay (LOHS), conversion rates, overall postoperative complications, and harvested lymph nodes. Pooled estimates were analyzed using the random-effect models.

RESULTS

The pooled analysis of five studies showed that the robotic group had a significantly shorter hospital stay and a lower conversion rate than the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05), while operative time was approximately 30 min shorter in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). Following exclusion of Zhao 2024, subanalysis of the remaining four studies demonstrated that the laparoscopic group still had a significantly shorter operative time and the robotic group maintained a significantly lower conversion rate; however, a significant difference in hospital stay was no longer present, and no significant differences were found for harvested lymph nodes or postoperative complications. No major difference was observed concerning lymph node yield and readmission rates between the surgical measures.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery was associated with a significantly lower conversion rate, whereas laparoscopic surgery was associated with significantly shorter operative times; no consistent advantage was observed for hospital stay, as this finding was not replicated in sensitivity analysis. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Для цитирования: Wang Chengzheng, Zhou Huaicheng. Robotic vs. laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in high BMI patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-026-04394-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.