MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique · 2001

[Natural history of focal nodular hyperplasia. A retrospective study of 44 cases].

D'halluin V, Vilgrain V, Pelletier G, Rocher L, Belghiti J, Erlinger S, Buffet C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate the natural course of focal nodular hyperplasia according to hormonal status.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. Tumor size was assessed with ultrasound examination. We studied the influence of hormone status on the course of the disease.

RESULTS

All patients were women, the median age at diagnosis was 35 years and the median follow-up was 45 months. Ten patients were symptomatic at diagnosis, while none were symptomatic at the end of follow-up. The median size of the lesions was 56 mm. No complications occurred. The size of the tumor remained stable in 19 patients, increased in 12 and decreased in 13. Twenty-one of 37 patients stopped taking oral contraceptives at diagnosis: the lesion remained stable in 11 patients, increased in 3 and decreased in 7. Two patients didn't stop taking oral contraceptives: the lesion increased in one, decreased in the other. Six patients became pregnant and 6 patients went into menopause during follow-up: the lesion remained stable in 3 and 4 patients respectively.

CONCLUSION

Focal nodular hyperplasia is a benign lesion. Tumor size remained stable in most cases. It seems that the hormonal status has little or no influence on the course of the disease.

Для цитирования: D'halluin V, Vilgrain V, Pelletier G, Rocher L, Belghiti J, Erlinger S, Buffet C. [Natural history of focal nodular hyperplasia. A retrospective study of 44 cases].. Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique. 2001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.