A Retrospective Comparison of Oncologic and Staging Outcomes Between Surgical Procedures-Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma.

Introduction

Lymph node status is a key prognostic factor of lung cancer. Although video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely used for early-stage disease, its consistency in achieving thorough lymph node dissection remains debated. While many studies show outcomes comparable to thoracotomy, others question its reliability for accurate staging in advanced cases. This study compared the oncologic efficacy of VATS and thoracotomy in pulmonary adenocarcinoma, focusing on lymph node dissection and postoperative outcomes. Materials and

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pulmonary adenocarcinoma between 2019 and 2023 at the "Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu" Oncological Institute, 52 undergoing thoracotomy and 59 Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS).

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Compared with thoracotomy, VATS was associated with a significantly higher number of harvested lymph nodes at stations 7 and 10. No significant differences between groups in the number of positive lymph nodes, postoperative morbidity, or 30-day mortality were observed.

Conclusions

VATS appears to provide comparable lymph node retrieval and short-term outcomes to open surgery. These findings add valuable data from an underrepresented Eastern European population and support the broader adoption of minimally invasive techniques in lung cancer surgery.