Is Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation Necessary for Suspected Early-stage Right-sided Colon Cancer?
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess lymph node status in patients undergoing additional surgery after endoscopic resection to evaluate the need for complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for clinically suspected early-stage right-sided colon cancer.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
This retrospective study, conducted at a single institution using a prospectively collected database, comprised patients who underwent additional surgery following endoscopic intervention between May 2003 and March 2022. The primary outcomes were the rate and location of lymph node metastases, including peritumoral, pericolic, and superior mesenteric lymph nodes. The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival.
RESULTS
Among 119 patients, pathological examination identified 5 (4.2%) with Tis requiring surgery owing to uncheckable margins or tumor depth, 106 (89.1%) with stage T1 tumors, and 8 (6.7%) with stage T2 tumors. The nodal stage was N0 in 107 patients (89.9%) and N1 in 12 (10.1%) patients. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 39.7, including 7.6 ± 6.9 peritumoral, 31.5 ± 14.4 pericolic, and 4.0 ± 3.8 superior mesenteric nodes. All metastatic lymph nodes were in the peritumoral and pericolic regions. At a mean follow-up of 48.2 months, recurrence occurred in one (0.8%) patient, who developed liver metastases 24 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
For patients with clinically suspected early-stage right-sided colon cancer who initially underwent endoscopic resection, the risk of superior mesenteric node metastases is very low. D2 lymph node dissection alone may be sufficient rather than routine application of complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation, which might be reconsidered in these patients.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.