MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zrag003

Медицинская библиотека · BJS open · 2025

Accuracy and variability of locoregional staging in T1 rectal cancer: nationwide multicentre cohort study.

Daca-Alvarez Maria, Manzotti Cristina, Zaffalon Diana, Portillo Isabel, Bujanda Luis, Gil-Lasa Inés, Ibañez-Sanz Gemma, Sanjuan Xavier, Herreros-de-Tejada Alberto, Salces Inmaculada, Aguilera Lara, Ponce Marta, Pizarro Ángeles, Barquero David, Puig Ignasi, Diez Redondo Pilar, Martínez de Juan Fernando, Morales Victor Jair, Alburquerque Marco, Machlab Salvador, Ferrandez Angel, Peñas Beatriz, Díaz-González Alvaro, Sargatal Lluïsa, Jover Rodrigo, Hernandez Luis, Pérez Pedrosa Alberto, Musulen Eva, Hernandez Goretti, Trelles Marita, Ono Akiko, Lopez Vicente Jorge, Bravo Raquel, Ayuso Juan R, Ginés Angels, Saez de Gordoa Karmele, Cuatrecasas Miriam, Pellisé Maria, EpiT1 Consortium

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Accurate locoregional staging is critical in the management of T1 rectal cancer and guides organ-preserving strategies. Despite guideline recommendations, the real-world performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the use and accuracy of locoregional staging in T1 rectal cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed from a nationwide multicentre T1 colorectal cancer cohort (EpiT1 Consortium) between 2007 and 2018 with a 5-year follow-up. Locoregional staging methods included MRI and EUS. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with locoregional imaging. The accuracy of each technique and their combination for T and N staging was assessed.

RESULTS

Among 3161 patients with T1 colorectal cancer, 681 had rectal cancer, of which 424 (62.3%) underwent locoregional staging: 234 (55.2%) with MRI only, 131 (30.9%) with both MRI and EUS, and 59 (13.9%) with EUS only. Factors associated with imaging (MRI and EUS) included management at a referral centre (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 5.7), tumour location in the low/middle rectum (odds ratio 3.2, 1.8 to 5.7), suspicion of invasive carcinoma at colonoscopy (odds ratio 2.4, 1.3 to 4.5), and high-risk histological features (odds ratio 3.7, 1.8 to 7.4). MRI accurately staged T in 28.3%, whereas EUS achieved an accuracy of 59% for T staging. Combining modalities overstaged 67.1% of tumours for T staging. N staging was detected with ≤ 16% sensitivity across all strategies; in the surgical group (MRI and/or EUS), overall accuracy was 78%.

CONCLUSION

Locoregional staging varied widely and was influenced by non-tumour-related factors. MRI and EUS showed modest accuracy, overstaging T, and low sensitivity for N. These findings highlight the need to improve pretreatment evaluation of T1 rectal cancer.

Для цитирования: Daca-Alvarez Maria, Manzotti Cristina, Zaffalon Diana, Portillo Isabel, Bujanda Luis, Gil-Lasa Inés, Ibañez-Sanz Gemma, Sanjuan Xavier, Herreros-de-Tejada Alberto, Salces Inmaculada, Aguilera Lara, Ponce Marta, Pizarro Ángeles, Barquero David, Puig Ignasi, Diez Redondo Pilar, Martínez de Juan Fernando, Morales Victor Jair, Alburquerque Marco, Machlab Salvador, Ferrandez Angel, Peñas Beatriz, Díaz-González Alvaro, Sargatal Lluïsa, Jover Rodrigo, Hernandez Luis, Pérez Pedrosa Alberto, Musulen Eva, Hernandez Goretti, Trelles Marita, Ono Akiko, Lopez Vicente Jorge, Bravo Raquel, Ayuso Juan R, Ginés Angels, Saez de Gordoa Karmele, Cuatrecasas Miriam, Pellisé Maria, EpiT1 Consortium. Accuracy and variability of locoregional staging in T1 rectal cancer: nationwide multicentre cohort study.. BJS open. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrag003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.