The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2026
Quality of consent documentation pre- and post-implementation of electronic consent (eConsent) in rhinology: a single-centre experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jalal Arif Hanafi Bin, Rotimi Oloruntobi, Mak Mandytien, Mandavia Rishi, Navaratnam Annakan Victor
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Electronic consent (eConsent) and procedure-specific consent forms have been highlighted as methods of improving the consent process. In this two-cycle audit, we assessed the quality of consent documentation pre- and post-implementation of eConsent.
METHODS: We reviewed paper (first cycle) and eConsent (second cycle) forms for discussion of benefits, risks and alternatives for septorhinoplasty and functional endoscopic sinus surgery. A survey which included the System Usability Scale was distributed to clinicians.
RESULTS: Post-implementation of eConsent, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of risks documented in septorhinoplasty (p-value < 0.001) though this was not the same for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Feedback was generally positive with a System Usability Scale score of 85.3 indicating high usability.
DISCUSSION: The implementation of eConsent with procedure-specific consent forms in our centre was well received with significant improvements in septorhinoplasty documentation and more modest improvements in FESS.
METHODS: We reviewed paper (first cycle) and eConsent (second cycle) forms for discussion of benefits, risks and alternatives for septorhinoplasty and functional endoscopic sinus surgery. A survey which included the System Usability Scale was distributed to clinicians.
RESULTS: Post-implementation of eConsent, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of risks documented in septorhinoplasty (p-value < 0.001) though this was not the same for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Feedback was generally positive with a System Usability Scale score of 85.3 indicating high usability.
DISCUSSION: The implementation of eConsent with procedure-specific consent forms in our centre was well received with significant improvements in septorhinoplasty documentation and more modest improvements in FESS.