Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
Premedication of Pediatric Cardiac Population with Midazolam: Comparison of Oral and Sublingual Administration Regarding Plasma Midazolam Concentration, Clinical Effectiveness, Hemodynamic and Behavioral Outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kousi Theofili, Karafotia Afroditi, Karageorgos Vlasios, Gkantinas Georgios, Sofianidou Ioanna, Kanakis Meletios, Smina Alexandra, Zergioti Ioanna, Tamvakopoulos Constantin, Antoniou Theofani
Аннотация
Background: Midazolam is widely used as a pediatric premedication, but evidence from direct comparisons of oral and sublingual administration in children with congenital heart disease remains limited, particularly that from pharmacokinetic and physiologic data analyzed together. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective randomized study comparing oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg with sublingual midazolam 0.3 mg/kg in children undergoing cardiac surgery or catheterization procedures under general anesthesia. Plasma midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam concentrations were measured approximately 30 min after administration. Log-transformed concentrations were compared using regression/ANCOVA models adjusted for dose and age. Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were analyzed from baseline to 15 and 30 min. Behavioral outcomes included the sedation score, separation from parents, and mask acceptance. Results: Sixty-eight children were randomized; 65 had evaluable pharmacokinetic samples and formed the complete-case pharmacokinetic cohort. Adjusted plasma midazolam concentrations did not differ significantly between the groups, with an adjusted geometric mean ratio for sublingual versus oral administration of 0.98 (95% CI 0.53-1.79; unadjusted p = 0.940; Holm-adjusted p = 1.000). The corresponding ratio for 1-hydroxymidazolam was 1.37 (95% CI 0.55-3.41; unadjusted p = 0.494; Holm-adjusted p = 1.000). HR and SpO2 changes were non-significant between the groups. At 30 min, sublingual administration was associated with a lower adjusted change in MAP compared with oral administration (adjusted difference -12.08 mmHg, 95% CI -19.74 to -4.42; unadjusted p = 0.002, Holm-adjusted p = 0.012). Behavioral outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: In this prospective randomized pediatric cardiac cohort, oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg and sublingual midazolam 0.3 mg/kg produced comparable plasma concentrations and similar behavioral outcomes. Sublingual administration was not associated with worse HR or SpO2 responses, although an isolated lower MAP change at 30 min warrants confirmation in larger studies. Sublingual midazolam may represent a feasible lower-dose alternative for premedication in this population.