Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2026
Medical 3-D Printing Within a Health Care Facility.
СтатьяConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rybicki Frank J, Arribas Elsa M, Atala Anthony, Ballard David H, Chepelev Leonid L, Decker Summer J, Ford Jonathan, Ghazi Ahmed, Gomez Ernest D, Najm Hani K, Noël Peter B, Morris Jonathan M, Weber Stephen C, Zablah Jenny E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Within the widespread use of medical 3-D printing at health care facilities (HCFs), the scope and complexity of patient-specific anatomic models and anatomic (surgical) guides are expanding. The authors formed a multidisciplinary panel to seek consensus regarding best practices for 3-D printing at a HCF.
METHODS: At the request of the ACR, a 14-member panel was formed with members nominated by 10 professional societies. This multidisciplinary team represented those involved in health care 3-D printing. The panel made statements and recommendations in five areas: (1) general statements, (2) practice recommendations, (3) quality and safety recommendations, (4) government relations recommendations, and (5) economics recommendations. Discussions and three rounds of meetings were conducted to reach consensus.
RESULTS: The panel members reached unanimous or near unanimous consensus on 25 statements and recommendations. The recommendations focused on consistent, safe, and sustainable 3-D-printed parts derived from medical images.
CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary collaboration represents consensus results on best practices regarding medical 3-D printing. These recommendations frame the typical workflow and provide a contemporary reference regarding common elements to the clinical procedure of 3-D printing at HCFs.
METHODS: At the request of the ACR, a 14-member panel was formed with members nominated by 10 professional societies. This multidisciplinary team represented those involved in health care 3-D printing. The panel made statements and recommendations in five areas: (1) general statements, (2) practice recommendations, (3) quality and safety recommendations, (4) government relations recommendations, and (5) economics recommendations. Discussions and three rounds of meetings were conducted to reach consensus.
RESULTS: The panel members reached unanimous or near unanimous consensus on 25 statements and recommendations. The recommendations focused on consistent, safe, and sustainable 3-D-printed parts derived from medical images.
CONCLUSIONS: This multidisciplinary collaboration represents consensus results on best practices regarding medical 3-D printing. These recommendations frame the typical workflow and provide a contemporary reference regarding common elements to the clinical procedure of 3-D printing at HCFs.