JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026
Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients With Prior Sternotomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mdaihly Mohamad, Demian Joe, Younis Arwa, Hajj Joseph, Watfa Adele, Motairek Issam, Tabaja Chadi, Houmsse Mustafa M, Santangeli Pasquale, Baranowski Bryan, Taigen Tyler L, Martin David O, Kanj Mohamed H, Bhargava Mandeep, Saliba Walid I, Hussein Ayman A, Wazni Oussama M, Callahan Thomas D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A history of sternotomy has been debated as either a potential protective factor or a possible risk for worse outcomes in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE). The safety and efficacy of TLE in this population remain underexplored.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of prior sternotomy on procedural outcomes in patients undergoing TLE.
METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained registry, we included all patients undergoing TLE at our center between 1996 and 2022. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether they had a prior sternotomy (PS). Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and safety profiles were compared. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of major complications.
RESULTS: Among 4,846 patients undergoing TLE, 1,344 (27.7%) had a prior sternotomy. These patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and an infectious indication for extraction. PS patients experienced significantly lower rates of major complications (1.4% vs 3.0%, P = 0.001), (1.2% vs 2.2%, P = 0.03), and emergent rescue cardiac surgeries (0.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.011), with higher procedural success rates. On multivariable analysis, PS was independently associated with reduced odds of major complications (OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89; P = 0.016) and major cardiovascular injury (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.98; P = 0.043). These findings persisted in a propensity score-matched cohort of 1,256 pairs, confirming significantly lower complication rates in the PS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite exhibiting higher comorbidities, PS patients had fewer major complications during TLE, suggesting a protective effect. Still, the challenges of repeat sternotomy highlight the need for recognizing these patients as high-risk should complications occur.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of prior sternotomy on procedural outcomes in patients undergoing TLE.
METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained registry, we included all patients undergoing TLE at our center between 1996 and 2022. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether they had a prior sternotomy (PS). Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and safety profiles were compared. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of major complications.
RESULTS: Among 4,846 patients undergoing TLE, 1,344 (27.7%) had a prior sternotomy. These patients had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and an infectious indication for extraction. PS patients experienced significantly lower rates of major complications (1.4% vs 3.0%, P = 0.001), (1.2% vs 2.2%, P = 0.03), and emergent rescue cardiac surgeries (0.7% vs 1.6%, P = 0.011), with higher procedural success rates. On multivariable analysis, PS was independently associated with reduced odds of major complications (OR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89; P = 0.016) and major cardiovascular injury (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.30-0.98; P = 0.043). These findings persisted in a propensity score-matched cohort of 1,256 pairs, confirming significantly lower complication rates in the PS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite exhibiting higher comorbidities, PS patients had fewer major complications during TLE, suggesting a protective effect. Still, the challenges of repeat sternotomy highlight the need for recognizing these patients as high-risk should complications occur.