MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.70477

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026

Procedural and Prognostic Implications of Guide Extension Catheter Use During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Itelman Edward, Rotholz Aviad, Bental Tamir, Lerman Tsahi T, Talmor-Barkan Yeela, Vaknin-Assa Hana, Levi Amos, Codner Pablo, Witberg Guy, Kornowski Ran, Perl Leor

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Guide extension catheters (GECs) have become an essential adjunctive tool in complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). GECs provide additional catheter support and stability, enhancing device deliverability.

AIMS: Our study aims to evaluate the technical and prognostic significance of the use of GECs in complex PCI.

METHODS

Our study included 23,299 PCI cases performed in a large tertiary center between 2010 and 2023. We assessed rates of procedural success with GEC. The primary clinical endpoint was all cause-mortality. Other clinical endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during follow-up. Cox regression, multivariate analysis, and propensity score matching were used to compare GEC and non-GEC PCI cases.

RESULTS

Of the 23,299 PCI cases in our study, 532 patients (2%) were treated utilizing GECs. The median age was 66 [IQR 58-75], and 88% were males. Successful PCI was performed in 96.2% of the total cohort, with similar rates in the GEC and non-GEC group (94.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.144). GEC was used more often in calcified, bifurcation, and unprotected left main lesions. Patients requiring the use of GEC had higher long-term mortality rates (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.54-2.23, p < 0.001) and MACE events (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.47, p = 0.004). Multivariate adjustments, sensitivity analysis of complex-PCI cases, and a propensity score-matched model showed similar results. A landmark analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day mortality but divergence of the survival curves after 30 days with increased mortality among the GEC cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that patients who required GEC during PCI were successfully treated in the vast majority of cases, with similar short-term results. However, the use of GEC is associated with a worse long-term prognosis, reflecting a surrogate for sicker patients and procedural complexity, thus requiring careful follow-up.

Для цитирования: Itelman Edward, Rotholz Aviad, Bental Tamir, Lerman Tsahi T, Talmor-Barkan Yeela, Vaknin-Assa Hana, Levi Amos, Codner Pablo, Witberg Guy, Kornowski Ran, Perl Leor. Procedural and Prognostic Implications of Guide Extension Catheter Use During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.70477.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.