MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.echo.2025.12.012

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025

Echocardiographic Estimation of Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure: Head-to-Head Comparison of 5 Methods.

Gentile Francesco, Latrofa Sara, Bazan Lorenzo, Barone Sara, Orsino Maria Francesca, Sciarrone Paolo, Russo Alice, Chianca Michela, Simi Giulia, Mori Francesco, Taddei Claudia, Poggianti Elisa, Airò Edoardo, Bauleo Carolina, Catapano Giosuè, Monti Simonetta, Petersen Christina, Passino Claudio, Emdin Michele, Chubuchny Vlad, Giannoni Alberto

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography is recommended for the initial evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH), while right heart catheterization (RHC) is indicated to measure mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP). Although different echocardiographic algorithms have been proposed to estimate mPAP, these are based on limited validation, often in small or selected populations, and all predate the revised PH diagnostic threshold (mPAP >20 mm Hg). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of 5 echocardiographic formulas for estimating mPAP in a large cohort of patients referred to RHC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing clinically indicated RHC and transthoracic echocardiograph within 7 days were prospectively enrolled from a PH referral center over a 10-year period. Echocardiographic mPAP estimates were calculated using 5 previously proposed formulas derived from tricuspid regurgitation (TR), pulmonary regurgitation (PR), and pulmonary flow acceleration time. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through correlation analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic curves, applying the updated PH definition (mPAP >20 mm Hg).

RESULTS

Out of 571 patients included (age 68 ± 13 years, 50% male), 450 (79%) were diagnosed with PH. All echocardiographic formulas showed significant correlation with invasive mPAP (P < .001). The formula based on minimal end-diastolic PR pressure showed the best correlation (mPAPDPmin; R = 0.92) and diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.96 [0.95-0.98]), outperforming mPAP derived from TR velocity (area under the curve, 0.91 [0.89-0.93]) and other formulas (all P < .001). The mPAPDPmin value also showed minimal bias (+1.21 mm Hg) with narrow limits of agreement (-7.14 to +9.56 mm Hg) and high accuracy at the fixed 20 mm Hg threshold (sensitivity, 99%; specificity, 82%).

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic estimation of mPAP using the mPAPDPmin formula provides excellent diagnostic accuracy for PH, outperforming other established echocardiographic algorithms.

Для цитирования: Gentile Francesco, Latrofa Sara, Bazan Lorenzo, Barone Sara, Orsino Maria Francesca, Sciarrone Paolo, Russo Alice, Chianca Michela, Simi Giulia, Mori Francesco, Taddei Claudia, Poggianti Elisa, Airò Edoardo, Bauleo Carolina, Catapano Giosuè, Monti Simonetta, Petersen Christina, Passino Claudio, Emdin Michele, Chubuchny Vlad, Giannoni Alberto. Echocardiographic Estimation of Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure: Head-to-Head Comparison of 5 Methods.. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.12.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.