Thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair using the Unitary Manifold Device.

OBJECTIVE

To present a single-center prospective study of 126 consecutively treated patients who underwent endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based Unitary Manifold (UM) device.

METHODS

Data were collected from 126 consecutive all-comer patients treated with the physician-modified, nonanatomic-based UM from 2015 to 2023. Treatment was performed at a single center by a single physician under a Physician Sponsored Investigation Exemption G140207.

RESULTS

The UM was indicated for repair of all Crawford extents including juxtarenal, pararenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) in 126 consecutive patients. Patients were not excluded from the study based on presentation, extent of aneurysm or dissection, or history of a spinal cord event. Patients with a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm were categorized by Crawford classification: types I and V (3.3%, n = 4), type II (3.3%, n = 4), type III (1%, n = 1), and type IV (93.3%, n = 117). The type IV classification patients were further categorized with 33 (28.2%) true type IV, 68 (58.1%) pararenal or infrarenal, and 16 (13.7%) with dissection. Technical success was 99.2% (n = 125). The most common major adverse event within both 30 days and 365 days of all patients was respiratory failure (11.9%, n = 15, and 13.5%, n = 17, respectively). One patient (0.8%) experienced persistent paraplegia at 365 days. Reintervention for patients at 365 days was 5.6% (n = 7). Of the 444 branches stented, the primary patency rate was remarkably high as only three patients (2.4%) required reintervention due to loss of limb patency within 365 days. Aneurysm enlargement (≥5 mm) occurred in 1.6% (n = 2) patients, and no patients experienced aneurysm rupture. No patients underwent conversion to open repair. The aneurysm-related mortality at 365 days for all patients was 4.0% (n = 5), whereas all-cause mortality was 16.7% (n = 21). Physician-modified endograft device integrity failure was not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The UM device demonstrated remarkable technical surgical success, treatment success, and device patency rates with very reasonable major adverse events and reintervention rates. This study is the most representative example of the general population in comparison with other studies of off-the-shelf devices, with 126 consecutive all-comer patients with diverse pathologies.