m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025

Method for generating right ventricular pressure-volume loops in routine practice.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kremer Nils, Glocker Felix, Schaefer Simon, Janetzko Patrick, Yogeswaran Athiththan, Rako Zvonimir, Thal Bruno, Hopf Hans-Bernd, Seeger Werner, Ghofrani Hossein-Ardeschir, Heerdt Paul M, Tello Khodr

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Analysis of pressure-volume (PV) loops from conductance catheterization is the gold standard for evaluating right ventricular (RV) function, but the complexity of conductance catheterization limits clinical implementation. This study validates a novel method for reconstructing RV PV loops from pressure waveforms acquired during routine right heart catheterization (RHC).

METHODS: An algorithm was developed to estimate RV volume from pressure using the hydromotive source pressure model with external calibration. The method was validated against conductance catheterization in swine (preclinical cohort) and in patients with pulmonary hypertension (clinical cohort), and against 3-dimensional echocardiography in patients with routine RHC (feasibility cohort). Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and correlation.

RESULTS: In the preclinical cohort (n = 10, 22 recordings), pressure-derived stroke work (SW) demonstrated very good agreement with conductance values (bias -0.4%; percentage error 7.0%). End-diastolic volume (EDV) showed moderate agreement (bias 3.7%; percentage error 29.0%). In the clinical cohort (n = 44, 44 recordings), agreement was good for SW (bias -2.8%; percentage error 14.6%) and borderline for EDV (bias -5.5%; percentage error 35.3%). In the feasibility cohort (n = 29, 29 recordings), agreement was good for ejection fraction (EF) (bias 2.2%, percentage error 30.3%) and moderate for stroke volume (SV), EDV, end-systolic elastance (Ees), and arterial elastance. All parameters correlated strongly with reference values (Pearson r ≥ 0.79, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: This pressure-based method reconstructs RV PV loops from standard RHC data and reliably estimates SW, contractility, and afterload, supporting its integration into routine clinical workflows (tool freely available at https://pv-loop-generator.onrender.com).

Предметные рубрики MeSH