Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2003
Emergency physicians' perspectives on smallpox vaccination.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kwon Nancy, Raven Maria C, Chiang William K, Moran Gregory J, Jui Jon, Carter Richard A, Goldfrank Lewis, EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate emergency physician (EP) attitudes toward smallpox vaccination, the treatment of patients with suspected smallpox, and the threat of a bioterrorist attack.
METHODS: This was a prospective study utilizing a standardized survey instrument that was distributed on November 16, 2002, and collected by February 1, 2003. EPs from a sample of 50 accredited emergency medicine programs were surveyed regarding their perspectives on smallpox vaccination.
RESULTS: A total of 989 surveys were collected from 42 emergency medicine programs. Of the respondents, 43.4% would currently volunteer for smallpox vaccination. EPs previously vaccinated against smallpox were 1.46 times more likely to volunteer for vaccination (95% CI = 1.14 to 1.93). EPs who believed they were at risk for complications were less than half as likely to volunteer for vaccination. EPs who perceived a significant risk of a bioterrorist attack were 2.7 times more likely to volunteer for the vaccine compared with those who thought the risk was minimal (95% CI = 2.06 to 3.47). Of the respondents, 34.4% believed the risks of the vaccination outweighed the benefits, 33% did not, and 32.6% were unsure.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, fewer than half of EPs surveyed would volunteer for smallpox vaccination. Factors associated with a willingness to be vaccinated include previous smallpox vaccination and the perceived threat of a bioterrorist attack. The variation in EP attitudes toward smallpox vaccination may be due to uncertain risk-to-benefit ratio. The opinions and actions of EPs may be influential on current and future government policy and public opinion.
METHODS: This was a prospective study utilizing a standardized survey instrument that was distributed on November 16, 2002, and collected by February 1, 2003. EPs from a sample of 50 accredited emergency medicine programs were surveyed regarding their perspectives on smallpox vaccination.
RESULTS: A total of 989 surveys were collected from 42 emergency medicine programs. Of the respondents, 43.4% would currently volunteer for smallpox vaccination. EPs previously vaccinated against smallpox were 1.46 times more likely to volunteer for vaccination (95% CI = 1.14 to 1.93). EPs who believed they were at risk for complications were less than half as likely to volunteer for vaccination. EPs who perceived a significant risk of a bioterrorist attack were 2.7 times more likely to volunteer for the vaccine compared with those who thought the risk was minimal (95% CI = 2.06 to 3.47). Of the respondents, 34.4% believed the risks of the vaccination outweighed the benefits, 33% did not, and 32.6% were unsure.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, fewer than half of EPs surveyed would volunteer for smallpox vaccination. Factors associated with a willingness to be vaccinated include previous smallpox vaccination and the perceived threat of a bioterrorist attack. The variation in EP attitudes toward smallpox vaccination may be due to uncertain risk-to-benefit ratio. The opinions and actions of EPs may be influential on current and future government policy and public opinion.