MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.049

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022

External Validation of the FREEDOM Score for Individualized Decision Making Between CABG and PCI.

Takahashi Kuniaki, Serruys Patrick W, Fuster Valentin, Farkouh Michael E, Spertus John A, Cohen David J, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo, Ahn Jung-Min, Onuma Yoshinobu, Kent David M, Steyerberg Ewout W, van Klaveren David, SYNTAX, BEST, and FREEDOM Trial investigators

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although randomized trials have established that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is, on average, the most effective revascularization strategy compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease (MVD), individual patients differ in many characteristics that can affect the benefits and harms of treatment. The FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus) score was developed to predict different outcomes with CABG vs PCI on the basis of 8 patient characteristics and the smoking-treatment interaction.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the ability of the 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) model to predict treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI in the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) and BEST (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) trials.

METHODS

This study identified 702 patients with diabetes and MVD to mirror the FREEDOM participants. Discrimination was assessed by C-index, and calibration was assessed by calibration plots in the PCI and CABG arms, respectively. The ability of the FREEDOM score to predict treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, CABG was associated with a lower rate of 5-year MACE compared with PCI (12.4% vs 20.3%; log-rank P = 0.021) irrespective of a history of smoking (Pinteraction = 0.975). Both discrimination and calibration were helpful in the PCI arm (C-index: 0.69; slope: 0.96, intercept: -0.24), but moderate in the CABG arm (C-index: 0.61; slope: 0.61; intercept: -0.53). The FREEDOM score showed some heterogeneity of treatment benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The FREEDOM score could identify some heterogeneity of treatment benefit of CABG vs PCI for 5-year MACE. Until further prospective validations are performed, these results should be taken into consideration when using the FREEDOM score in patients with diabetes and MVD. (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery [SYNTAX]; NCT00114972) (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [BEST]; NCT00997828) (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus [FREEDOM]; NCT00086450).

Для цитирования: Takahashi Kuniaki, Serruys Patrick W, Fuster Valentin, Farkouh Michael E, Spertus John A, Cohen David J, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo, Ahn Jung-Min, Onuma Yoshinobu, Kent David M, Steyerberg Ewout W, van Klaveren David, SYNTAX, BEST, and FREEDOM Trial investigators. External Validation of the FREEDOM Score for Individualized Decision Making Between CABG and PCI.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.