Diagnostic value of fully automated CT pulmonary angiography in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and chronic thromboembolic disease.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the value of employing artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED).

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis of 350 sequential patients with right heart catheterization (RHC)-confirmed CTEPH, CTED, and normal controls was conducted. Parameters such as the main pulmonary artery diameter (MPAd), the ratio of MPA to ascending aorta diameter (MPAd/AAd), the ratio of right to left ventricle diameter (RVd/LVd), and the ratio of RV to LV volume (RVv/LVv) were evaluated using automated AI software and compared with manual analysis. The reliability was assessed through an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. The diagnostic accuracy was determined using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Compared to CTED and control groups, CTEPH patients were significantly more likely to have elevated automatic CTPA metrics (all p < 0.001, respectively). Automated MPAd, MPAd/Aad, and RVv/LVv had a strong correlation with mPAP (r = 0.952, 0.904, and 0.815, respectively, all p < 0.001). The automated and manual CTPA analyses showed strong concordance. For the CTEPH and CTED categories, the optimal area under the curve (AU-ROC) reached 0.939 (CI: 0.908-0.969). In the CTEPH and control groups, the best AU-ROC was 0.970 (CI: 0.953-0.988). In the CTED and control groups, the best AU-ROC was 0.782 (CI: 0.724-0.840).

CONCLUSION

Automated AI-driven CTPA analysis provides a dependable approach for evaluating patients with CTEPH, CTED, and normal controls, demonstrating excellent consistency and efficiency.

KEY POINTS: Question Guidelines do not advocate for applying treatment protocols for CTEPH to patients with CTED; early detection of the condition is crucial. Findings Automated CTPA analysis was feasible in 100% of patients with good agreement and would have added information for early detection and identification. Clinical relevance Automated AI-driven CTPA analysis provides a reliable approach demonstrating excellent consistency and efficiency. Additionally, these noninvasive imaging findings may aid in treatment stratification and determining optimal intervention directed by RHC.