MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.460

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular surgery · 2019

Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Anderson Peter B, Wanken Zachary J, Perri Jennifer L, Columbo Jesse A, Kang Ravinder, Spangler Emily L, Newhall Karina, Brooke Benjamin S, Dosluoglu Hasan, Lee Eugene S, Raffetto Joseph D, Henke Peter K, Tang Gale L, Mureebe Leila, Kougias Panagiotis, Johanning Jason, Arya Shipra, Scali Salvatore T, Stone David H, Suckow Bjoern D, Orion Kristine, Halpern Vivienne, O'Connell Jessica, Inhat Daniel, Nelson Peter, Tzeng Edith, Zhou Wei, Barry Michael, Sirovich Brenda, Goodney Philip P, PROVE-AAA Study Team

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Shared medical decision making is most important when there are competing options for repair such as in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We sought to understand the sources of patients' pre-existing knowledge about AAA to better inform treating physicians about patients' needs for preoperative counseling.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter survey of patients facing AAA repair at 20 Veterans Affairs hospitals across the United States as part of the Preferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of AAA study. A validated survey instrument was administered to examine the sources of information available and commonly used by patients to learn about their repair options. The survey was administered by study personnel before the patient had any interaction with the vascular surgeon because survey data were collected before the vascular clinic visit.

RESULTS

Preliminary analysis of data from 99 patients showed that our cohort was primarily male (99%) and elderly (mean age 73 years). Patients commonly had a history of hypertension (86%), prior myocardial infarction (32%), diabetes (32%), and were overweight (58%). Patients arrived at their surgeon's office appointment with limited information. A majority of patients (52%) reported that they had not talked to their primary care physician at all about their options for AAA repair, and one-half (50%) reported that their view of the different surgical options had not been influenced by anyone. Slightly less than one-half of patients reported that they did not receive any information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (41% and 37%, respectively). Few patients indicated using the internet as their main source of information about open surgical aneurysm repair and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (10% and 11%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are commonly referred for AAA repair having little to no information regarding AAA pathology or repair options. Fewer than one in five patients searched the internet or had accessed other sources of information on their own. Most vascular surgeons should assume that patients will present to their first vascular surgery appointment with minimal understanding of the treatment options available to them.

Для цитирования: Anderson Peter B, Wanken Zachary J, Perri Jennifer L, Columbo Jesse A, Kang Ravinder, Spangler Emily L, Newhall Karina, Brooke Benjamin S, Dosluoglu Hasan, Lee Eugene S, Raffetto Joseph D, Henke Peter K, Tang Gale L, Mureebe Leila, Kougias Panagiotis, Johanning Jason, Arya Shipra, Scali Salvatore T, Stone David H, Suckow Bjoern D, Orion Kristine, Halpern Vivienne, O'Connell Jessica, Inhat Daniel, Nelson Peter, Tzeng Edith, Zhou Wei, Barry Michael, Sirovich Brenda, Goodney Philip P, PROVE-AAA Study Team. Patient information sources when facing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.. Journal of vascular surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.460.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.