Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2018
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Urogynecologic Surgery Cancelation Rates.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Berger Alexander A, Giugale Lauren E, Shepherd Jonathan P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We examined the impact of the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) surgical cancelation rates.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients scheduling FPMRS procedures 1 year before and after ACA implementation at a regional academic medical center. We compared cancelation rates as well as sociodemographic, surgical, and medical history data. Analysis included χ test, t test, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: We included 746 subjects, 373 each before and after ACA implementation (January 2014). Subjects were 59.2 ± 14.0 years old, predominantly white (94.9%), employed (45.8%), and married (66.6%), with a body mass index of 28.8 ± 6.2. Subjects lived a median of 24 miles from the hospital. None of these were significant predictors of cancelations. Surgery cancelation rate was 17.1% and occurred 9 days before surgery.On univariable analysis, cancelation rates did not differ relative to the ACA (15.5% before vs 18.6% after; mean difference, 3.16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.29% to 8.69%; P = 0.254). Only 3 variables impacted cancelation rate on univariable analysis: women whose surgery was scheduled for later in the week, liver/renal disease, and minor vs major surgery.On multivariable regression including variables with P < 0.20 as candidate variables, the same 3 variables remained significant. Cancelations increased with procedures scheduled later in the week (odds ratio [OR], 1.169 per day; 95% CI, 1.004-1.361) and liver or renal disease (OR, 2.342; 95% CI, 1.015-5.405). Major procedures had fewer cancelations (OR, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.414-0.943). The ACA implementation of still did not impact cancelations (OR, 1.230; 95% CI, 0.831-1.821).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ACA did not impact FPMRS cancelation rates. Significant predictors of surgical cancelation included later day of the week, comorbid renal or liver disease, and performance of a minor procedure.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients scheduling FPMRS procedures 1 year before and after ACA implementation at a regional academic medical center. We compared cancelation rates as well as sociodemographic, surgical, and medical history data. Analysis included χ test, t test, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: We included 746 subjects, 373 each before and after ACA implementation (January 2014). Subjects were 59.2 ± 14.0 years old, predominantly white (94.9%), employed (45.8%), and married (66.6%), with a body mass index of 28.8 ± 6.2. Subjects lived a median of 24 miles from the hospital. None of these were significant predictors of cancelations. Surgery cancelation rate was 17.1% and occurred 9 days before surgery.On univariable analysis, cancelation rates did not differ relative to the ACA (15.5% before vs 18.6% after; mean difference, 3.16%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.29% to 8.69%; P = 0.254). Only 3 variables impacted cancelation rate on univariable analysis: women whose surgery was scheduled for later in the week, liver/renal disease, and minor vs major surgery.On multivariable regression including variables with P < 0.20 as candidate variables, the same 3 variables remained significant. Cancelations increased with procedures scheduled later in the week (odds ratio [OR], 1.169 per day; 95% CI, 1.004-1.361) and liver or renal disease (OR, 2.342; 95% CI, 1.015-5.405). Major procedures had fewer cancelations (OR, 0.625; 95% CI, 0.414-0.943). The ACA implementation of still did not impact cancelations (OR, 1.230; 95% CI, 0.831-1.821).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ACA did not impact FPMRS cancelation rates. Significant predictors of surgical cancelation included later day of the week, comorbid renal or liver disease, and performance of a minor procedure.