Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
Variations and inequities in access to cardiac diagnostic services in Ontario Canada.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wardle Gavin, Sanfilippo Anthony J, Narula Ashrut, Kolos Andriy, Chan Kwan, Leong-Poi Howard, Sasson Zion, Woodward Graham
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is an essential diagnostic modality known to have wide regional utilization variations. This study's objectives were to quantify regional variations and to examine the extent to which they are explained by differences in population age, sex, cardiac disease prevalence (CDP), and social determinants of health (SDH) risk.
METHODS: This is an observational study of all echocardiography exams performed in Ontario in 2019/20 (n = 695,622). We measured regional variations in echocardiography crude rates and progressively standardized rates for population age, sex, CDP, and SDH risk.
RESULTS: After controlling for differences in population age, sex, and CDP, Ontario's highest rate regions had echocardiography rates 57% higher than its lowest rate regions. Forty eight percent of total variation was not explained by differences in age, sex, and CDP. CDP increased with SDH risk. Access to most cardiac diagnostics was negatively correlated with SDH risk, while cardiac catheterization rates were positively correlated with SDH risk.
CONCLUSION: Variations analysis that adjusts for age and sex only without including clinical measures of need are likely to overestimate the unwarranted portion of total variation. Substantial variations persisted despite a mandatory provider accreditation policy aimed at curtailing them. The associations between variations and SDH risks imply a need to redress access and outcome inequities.
METHODS: This is an observational study of all echocardiography exams performed in Ontario in 2019/20 (n = 695,622). We measured regional variations in echocardiography crude rates and progressively standardized rates for population age, sex, CDP, and SDH risk.
RESULTS: After controlling for differences in population age, sex, and CDP, Ontario's highest rate regions had echocardiography rates 57% higher than its lowest rate regions. Forty eight percent of total variation was not explained by differences in age, sex, and CDP. CDP increased with SDH risk. Access to most cardiac diagnostics was negatively correlated with SDH risk, while cardiac catheterization rates were positively correlated with SDH risk.
CONCLUSION: Variations analysis that adjusts for age and sex only without including clinical measures of need are likely to overestimate the unwarranted portion of total variation. Substantial variations persisted despite a mandatory provider accreditation policy aimed at curtailing them. The associations between variations and SDH risks imply a need to redress access and outcome inequities.