MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/jaha.122.029850

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024

Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Reynolds Harmony R, Cyr Derek D, Merz C Noel Bairey, Shaw Leslee J, Chaitman Bernard R, Boden William E, Alexander Karen P, Rosenberg Yves D, Bangalore Sripal, Stone Gregg W, Held Claes, Spertus John, Goetschalckx Kaatje, Bockeria Olga, Newman Jonathan D, Berger Jeffrey S, Elghamaz Ahmed, Lopes Renato D, Min James K, Berman Daniel S, Picard Michael H, Kwong Raymond Y, Harrington Robert A, Thomas Boban, O'Brien Sean M, Maron David J, Hochman Judith S, ISCHEMIA Research Group *

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Women with chronic coronary disease are generally older than men and have more comorbidities but less atherosclerosis. We explored sex differences in revascularization, guideline-directed medical therapy, and outcomes among patients with chronic coronary disease with ischemia on stress testing, with and without invasive management.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial randomized patients with moderate or severe ischemia to invasive management with angiography, revascularization, and guideline-directed medical therapy, or initial conservative management with guideline-directed medical therapy alone. We evaluated the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) and other end points, by sex, in 1168 (22.6%) women and 4011 (77.4%) men. Invasive group catheterization rates were similar, with less revascularization among women (73.4% of invasive-assigned women revascularized versus 81.2% of invasive-assigned men; P<0.001). Women had less coronary artery disease: multivessel in 60.0% of invasive-assigned women and 74.8% of invasive-assigned men, and no ≥50% stenosis in 12.3% versus 4.5% (P<0.001). In the conservative group, 4-year catheterization rates were 26.3% of women versus 25.6% of men (P=0.72). Guideline-directed medical therapy use was lower among women with fewer risk factor goals attained. There were no sex differences in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for women versus men, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]; P=0.47) or the major secondary outcome of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.14]; P=0.49), with no significant sex-by-treatment-group interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Women had less extensive coronary artery disease and, therefore, lower revascularization rates in the invasive group. Despite lower risk factor goal attainment, women with chronic coronary disease experienced similar risk-adjusted outcomes to men in the ISCHEMIA trial.

REGISTRATION: URL: http://wwwclinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

Для цитирования: Reynolds Harmony R, Cyr Derek D, Merz C Noel Bairey, Shaw Leslee J, Chaitman Bernard R, Boden William E, Alexander Karen P, Rosenberg Yves D, Bangalore Sripal, Stone Gregg W, Held Claes, Spertus John, Goetschalckx Kaatje, Bockeria Olga, Newman Jonathan D, Berger Jeffrey S, Elghamaz Ahmed, Lopes Renato D, Min James K, Berman Daniel S, Picard Michael H, Kwong Raymond Y, Harrington Robert A, Thomas Boban, O'Brien Sean M, Maron David J, Hochman Judith S, ISCHEMIA Research Group *. Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2024. DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.029850.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.