Digestion · 2016
Prediction of Poor Response to Modified Neuroleptanalgesia with Midazolam for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ominami Masaki, Nagami Yasuaki, Shiba Masatsugu, Tominaga Kazunari, Maruyama Hirotsugu, Okamoto Junichi, Kato Kunihiro, Minamino Hiroaki, Fukunaga Shusei, Sugimori Satoshi, Yamagami Hirokazu, Tanigawa Tetsuya, Watanabe Toshio, Fujiwara Yasuhiro, Arakawa Tetsuo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Modified neuroleptanalgesia (m-NLA) with midazolam is often used for sedation and analgesia during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal neoplasia. However, interruption due to poor response to midazolam is often experienced during ESD for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) because most patients with ESCC have a history of heavy alcohol intake. We examined the incidence and risk factors for poor response to m-NLA with midazolam and pethidine hydrochloride.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a single institution. Between April 2007 and July 2013, 151 patients with superficial ESCC who underwent ESD under sedation using m-NLA with midazolam and pethidine hydrochloride were enrolled. Poor response to sedation was defined as the use of a second drug when Ramsay Sedation Score 1-2.
RESULTS: Poor response to sedation occurred in 66.2% patients. Most cases of poor response were controlled by using additional flunitrazepam. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cumulative alcohol intake and major specimen size were independent risk factors for poor response to sedation (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.20-10.99, and OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.26-8.25).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that cumulative alcohol intake and major specimen size were associated with poor response to m-NLA with midazolam and pethidine hydrochloride.
METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a single institution. Between April 2007 and July 2013, 151 patients with superficial ESCC who underwent ESD under sedation using m-NLA with midazolam and pethidine hydrochloride were enrolled. Poor response to sedation was defined as the use of a second drug when Ramsay Sedation Score 1-2.
RESULTS: Poor response to sedation occurred in 66.2% patients. Most cases of poor response were controlled by using additional flunitrazepam. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cumulative alcohol intake and major specimen size were independent risk factors for poor response to sedation (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.20-10.99, and OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.26-8.25).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that cumulative alcohol intake and major specimen size were associated with poor response to m-NLA with midazolam and pethidine hydrochloride.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Adjuvants, AnesthesiaAgedAlcoholismCarcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMeperidineMidazolamMiddle AgedNeuroleptanalgesiaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome