MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jramc-2015-000614

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2016

Appendicitis in a deployed military setting: diagnosis, management and impact on the fighting force.

Howes Rachel, Webster C, Garner J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is a principal cause of abdominal pain worldwide and most common in young men who constitute the majority of the deployed fighting force. Diagnostic accuracy is paramount to prevent unnecessary intervention, morbidity and force impact.

METHOD: A consecutive series of appendicectomies, performed over 28 months on deployment in Afghanistan, was evaluated to assess the negative appendicectomy (NA) rate, explore the impact of CT on the rates of NA and assess the impact of appendicectomy on manpower in the deployed workforce.

RESULTS

In Afghanistan, the operative NA rate was 9.6%, whereas the histological NA rate was 20.5%. CT was widely used in Afghanistan (36%) and there was a significant reduction in NA rates if CT was performed preoperatively (6.25% vs 26%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic imaging will be limited in future conflicts and reliance on clinical judgement will be necessary. Military clinicians may need to accept higher rates of NA, as prolonged observation may not be possible. CT scanning should be used to a greater extent when available. A conservative management strategy for appendicitis with appropriate antibiotics should be considered in the event of delayed transfer to a surgical facility.

Для цитирования: Howes Rachel, Webster C, Garner J. Appendicitis in a deployed military setting: diagnosis, management and impact on the fighting force.. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 2016. DOI: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000614.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.