MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25259/sni_593_2022

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2022

Endovascular therapy for cardiocerebral infarction associated with atrial fibrillation: A case report and literature review.

Nakajima Hideki, Tsuchiya Takuro, Shimizu Shigetoshi, Watanabe Kiyotaka, Kitamura Tetsuya, Suzuki Hidenori

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiocerebral infarction (CCI) is a rare entity that refers to the simultaneous occurrence of acute myocardial infarction and acute ischemic stroke. The management of CCI patients remains unclear.

CASE DESCRIPTION: An 86-year-old woman with a medical history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation presented with a sudden onset of consciousness disturbance and right hemiplegia. Computed tomography of the head revealed no intracranial hemorrhage but the left hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign, associated with ST-segment elevation in II, III, and aVF noted on a routine 12-lead electrocardiogram at admission. The patient was immediately brought to the catheterization laboratory and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed first, followed by mechanical thrombectomy, resulting in successful revascularization of the both diseases.

CONCLUSION

Although the treatment strategy of CCI may depend on the condition of coronary and cerebral ischemia, it may be appropriate to prioritize coronary angiography and PCI if not acute ischemic stroke is critical.

Для цитирования: Nakajima Hideki, Tsuchiya Takuro, Shimizu Shigetoshi, Watanabe Kiyotaka, Kitamura Tetsuya, Suzuki Hidenori. Endovascular therapy for cardiocerebral infarction associated with atrial fibrillation: A case report and literature review.. Surgical neurology international. 2022. DOI: 10.25259/sni_593_2022.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.