MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1797-5

Медицинская библиотека · Digestive diseases and sciences · 2011

Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): patients' perceptions and attitudes.

Li Wen, Xu Hong, Wang Zi-Kai, Fan Zhi-Ning, Ba Shan-Duo, Zou Duo-Wu, Ren Xu, Hu Bing, Huang Yong-Hui, Sun Ming-Jun, Liu Jie, Li Wen, Xu Ping, Zhu Qi, Liu Si-De, Xiao Jian-Guo

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has generated a surge of enthusiasm among researchers by virtue of its challenge to the dogma and potential benefits. However, no data is available in the medical literature about NOTES' acceptance by patients in Asia. The aim of the study is to survey patients' perceptions and attitudes towards NOTES.

METHODS

It is a questionnaire-based multi-center study on inpatient subjects with various gastrointestinal disorders from 14 hospitals in 12 cities of China. Procedural details with the benefits and risks of NOTES, laparoscopic surgery, and conventional surgery were explained to all registered candidates. They were required to choose and cite reasons for adopting one of the above three surgical techniques as the preferred mode of treatment. The reasons for selection of the surgical treatment were: safety, efficacy, cost, postoperative pain, abdominal wounds, and scarring.

RESULTS

There were 1,797 cases, including 976 (54.3%) males and 821 females (45.7%). Based on their comprehension of the procedure, 802 (44.6%) patients opted for NOTES, 757 (42.1%) for laparoscopic surgery, and 238 (13.2%) for conventional surgery. NOTES was mainly selected by the young and educated persons, especially females and by those with past exposure to laparoscopy or conventional surgery. The choice of treatment was significantly correlated with age (P=0.0021), education (P=0.0209), past medical history (laparoscopy, P=0.0134; open surgery, P<0.0001), and department of admission (P=0.0173). The preference for NOTES was based on safety (37.3%), cost (17.6%), elimination of postoperative scars (16.1%), abdominal wounds (16.0%), and efficacy (13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients prefer mini-invasive surgery to conventional surgery. The potential recipients of NOTES are educated and younger age groups. However, a few consider NOTES as a safe and effective intervention at present.

Для цитирования: Li Wen, Xu Hong, Wang Zi-Kai, Fan Zhi-Ning, Ba Shan-Duo, Zou Duo-Wu, Ren Xu, Hu Bing, Huang Yong-Hui, Sun Ming-Jun, Liu Jie, Li Wen, Xu Ping, Zhu Qi, Liu Si-De, Xiao Jian-Guo. Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): patients' perceptions and attitudes.. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1797-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.