International journal of cardiology · 2022
Effectiveness and cost-efficacy of diuretics home administration via peripherally inserted central venous catheter in patients with end-stage heart failure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Godino Cosmo, Scotti Andrea, Marengo Alessandra, Battini Ivana, Brambilla Paola, Stucchi Silvia, Slavich Massimo, Salerno Anna, Fragasso Gabriele, Margonato Alberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: End-stage heart failure (ESHF) is characterized by severe cardiac dysfunction with persistent disabling symptoms and recurrent acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), despite guideline-directed medical therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous diuretics administration at home through a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in ESHF patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one ESHF patients received PICC implantation for intravenous diuretic administration at home. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patient-level number of HF hospitalizations in the short (1-3 months), medium (six months), and long term (1 year), before and after PICC implantation. Pre- and post-PICC ADHF-free days were also evaluated as co-primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints comprised changes in clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters, and device safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to estimate the economic impact of using PICC. For each time frame analyzed, a significant reduction in the number of hospitalizations due to ADHF was observed, resulting in a significant increase in ADHF-free days (71 ± 44 vs. 163 ± 136, p = 0.003). In matched patients' analysis, significant decrease in body weight (68 ± 16 kg vs. 63 ± 10 kg, p = 0.041) and mitral regurgitation grade 3/4 (55% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) were also observed. Freedom from PICC-related complications was observed in 61% of patients. A significant reduction in overall ADHF-hospitalizations cost was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of home administration of intravenous diuretic therapy via PICC in ESHF patients. This palliative cost-effective strategy can be taken in consideration for selected end-stage patients no longer responsive to conventional therapies.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one ESHF patients received PICC implantation for intravenous diuretic administration at home. The primary efficacy endpoint was the patient-level number of HF hospitalizations in the short (1-3 months), medium (six months), and long term (1 year), before and after PICC implantation. Pre- and post-PICC ADHF-free days were also evaluated as co-primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints comprised changes in clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters, and device safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to estimate the economic impact of using PICC. For each time frame analyzed, a significant reduction in the number of hospitalizations due to ADHF was observed, resulting in a significant increase in ADHF-free days (71 ± 44 vs. 163 ± 136, p = 0.003). In matched patients' analysis, significant decrease in body weight (68 ± 16 kg vs. 63 ± 10 kg, p = 0.041) and mitral regurgitation grade 3/4 (55% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) were also observed. Freedom from PICC-related complications was observed in 61% of patients. A significant reduction in overall ADHF-hospitalizations cost was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of home administration of intravenous diuretic therapy via PICC in ESHF patients. This palliative cost-effective strategy can be taken in consideration for selected end-stage patients no longer responsive to conventional therapies.