Sports medicine and health science · 2024
ATLAS study: Design, athletic performance, and sex-specific regression models for muscle strength in the Greek population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pogosova Natia A, Brekou Despoina, Gavra Ioanna E, Katsareli Efthymia A, More Eleni, Symianakis Panagiotis G, Kafyra Maria, Kalafati Ioanna Panagiota, Arnaoutis Giannis, Dedoussis George V
Аннотация
PURPOSE: ATLAS is a cross-sectional study aiming to investigate environmental and genetic determinants of athletic performance in healthy Greek competitive athletes (CA). This article presents the study design, investigates the muscle strength performance (MSP) of 289 adult and teenage CA, exercisers, and physically inactive individuals (PI), and proposes predictive models of MSP for adults.
METHODS: Muscle maximal, speed, and explosive strength (MMS/MSS/MES) at unilateral maximal concentric flexion and extension contraction (FC/EC) were evaluated using Biodex System 3 PRO™ at 60 °/s, 180 °/s, and 300 °/s, while additional performance markers were assessed through field ergometric testing. Participants were interviewed about their lifestyle, dietary habits, physical activity, injury, and medical history. Body composition was assessed via bioelectrical impedance. gDNA was extracted from biochemical samples and then genotyped. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 and R.
RESULTS: Age, fitness, and sex impacted correlations of MSP with body composition and anthropometric measurements (p < 0.05). Among CA, females outperformed males in accuracy (p < 0.001) while, males outperformed females in anaerobic power, MSP, speed, and endurance (p < 0.001). Adult CA outperformed exercisers and PI in MMS, MSS, and MES (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression models, with predictors age, FFM, body extremity, training load explained the majority of variation in MMS (R 2 adj:71.4%-88.9%), MSS (R 2 adj:64.8%-78.4 %), and MES (R 2 adj:52.7%-68.4 %) at EC, FC, and their mean (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-strengthening strategies should be customized according to individual fitness levels, body composition, and anthropometric measurements. The innovative sex-specific regression models assessing MMS, MSS, and MES at EC and FC provide a framework for personalizing rehabilitation and skill-specific training strategies.
METHODS: Muscle maximal, speed, and explosive strength (MMS/MSS/MES) at unilateral maximal concentric flexion and extension contraction (FC/EC) were evaluated using Biodex System 3 PRO™ at 60 °/s, 180 °/s, and 300 °/s, while additional performance markers were assessed through field ergometric testing. Participants were interviewed about their lifestyle, dietary habits, physical activity, injury, and medical history. Body composition was assessed via bioelectrical impedance. gDNA was extracted from biochemical samples and then genotyped. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 and R.
RESULTS: Age, fitness, and sex impacted correlations of MSP with body composition and anthropometric measurements (p < 0.05). Among CA, females outperformed males in accuracy (p < 0.001) while, males outperformed females in anaerobic power, MSP, speed, and endurance (p < 0.001). Adult CA outperformed exercisers and PI in MMS, MSS, and MES (p < 0.05). Multiple linear regression models, with predictors age, FFM, body extremity, training load explained the majority of variation in MMS (R 2 adj:71.4%-88.9%), MSS (R 2 adj:64.8%-78.4 %), and MES (R 2 adj:52.7%-68.4 %) at EC, FC, and their mean (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Muscle-strengthening strategies should be customized according to individual fitness levels, body composition, and anthropometric measurements. The innovative sex-specific regression models assessing MMS, MSS, and MES at EC and FC provide a framework for personalizing rehabilitation and skill-specific training strategies.