MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.016

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2021

Qualitative Examination of Voting Empowerment and Participation Among People Living With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Hammond Flora M, Davis Christine S, Hirsch Mark A, Snow Julia M, Kropf Martha E, Schur Lisa, Kruse Douglas, Ball Andrew M

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine political participation after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

DESIGN

Qualitative, participatory research via interviews and observations. Each participant was interviewed to discuss their experience of voting in 2007 or 2008. Data were coded using Grounded Theory to develop themes, metacodes, and theories.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 57 individuals with history of TBI and 28 family members (N=85).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: (1) people with TBI have barriers to voting; (2) the voting process can be improved for people with TBI; (3) voting is the responsibility of members of society; and (4) voting is one way we have a voice in society.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support the importance of voting as an American right regardless of the presence of disability. While persons with TBI report voting represents their freedom and voice, there may be barriers that can threaten or limit their voice.

Для цитирования: Hammond Flora M, Davis Christine S, Hirsch Mark A, Snow Julia M, Kropf Martha E, Schur Lisa, Kruse Douglas, Ball Andrew M. Qualitative Examination of Voting Empowerment and Participation Among People Living With Traumatic Brain Injury.. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.