MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000001399

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2020

Nonantibiotic Strategies for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pradere Benjamin, Veeratterapillay Rajan, Dimitropoulos Konstantinos, Yuan Yuhong, Omar Muhammad Imran, MacLennan Steven, Cai Tommaso, Bruyère Franck, Bartoletti Riccardo, Köves Bela, Wagenlehner Florian, Bonkat Gernot, Pilatz Adrian

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We identify which nonantibiotic strategies could reduce the risk of infectious complications following prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We performed a literature search on MEDLINE®, Embase® and the Cochrane Database for randomized controlled trials (inception to May 2020) assessing nonantibiotic interventions in prostate biopsy. Primary outcome was pooled infectious complications (fever, sepsis and symptomatic urinary tract infection) and secondary outcome was hospitalization. Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE approach were used to assess the bias and the certainty of evidence. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015026354).

RESULTS

A total of 90 randomized controlled trials (16,941 participants) were included in the analysis, with 83 trials being categorized into one of 10 different interventions. Transperineal biopsy was associated with significantly reduced infectious complications as compared to transrectal biopsy (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.92, p=0.02, I2=0%, 1,330 participants, 7 studies). Rectal preparation with povidone-iodine was also shown to reduce infectious complications (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.65, p <0.000001, I2=27%, 1,686 participants, 8 studies) as well as hospitalization (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69, p=0.002, I2=0%, 620 participants, 4 studies). We found no difference in infectious complications/hospitalization for 6 other interventions, ie number of biopsy cores, periprostatic nerve block, number of injections for periprostatic nerve block, needle guide type, needle type and rectal preparation with enema. In 2 interventions (needle diameter, rectal preparation with chlorhexidine) meta-analysis was not possible. Finally, 7 studies had unique interventions. The certainty of evidence was rated as low/very low for all interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Transperineal biopsy significantly reduces infectious complications compared to transrectal biopsy and should therefore be preferred. If transrectal biopsy is performed, rectal preparation with povidone-iodine is highly recommended. The other investigated nonantibiotic strategies did not significantly influence infection and hospitalization after prostate biopsy.

Для цитирования: Pradere Benjamin, Veeratterapillay Rajan, Dimitropoulos Konstantinos, Yuan Yuhong, Omar Muhammad Imran, MacLennan Steven, Cai Tommaso, Bruyère Franck, Bartoletti Riccardo, Köves Bela, Wagenlehner Florian, Bonkat Gernot, Pilatz Adrian. Nonantibiotic Strategies for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. The Journal of urology. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001399.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.