Rehabilitation psychology · 2019
Rey Tangled Line Test: A measure of processing speed in TBI.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Joseph Annie-Lori C, Peterson Hope A, Garcia Katelyn M, McNally Shannon M, Mburu Tracyann K, Lippa Sara M, Dsurney John, Chan Leighton
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Neuropsychological assessment plays a key role in characterizing and detecting cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Rey Tangled Line Test (RTLT), an understudied neuropsychological assessment thought to be capable of detecting visual processing deficits, was examined to determine which cognitive abilities may contribute to performance on the test in participants with a history of TBI.
METHOD: One-hundred participants with a history of mild to severe TBI were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing attention, executive functioning, memory, visual construction, motor functioning, and processing speed between 30 days and 5 years postinjury. An exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to determine which cognitive tests the RTLT was most highly associated with.
RESULTS: No difference in RTLT latency was present between mild and moderate/severe TBI. The PCA resulted in 5 factors. RTLT latency had a significant primary factor loading on the "processing speed" factor, and a secondary loading on the "motor" factor. Forty-two percent of participants had an impaired latency score.
CONCLUSIONS: RTLT latency appears to measure processing speed, and likely aspects of motor functioning, in our sample. The RTLT may be useful as a rapid assessment in individuals with a history of TBI to detect cognitive deficit before initiating further cognitive testing or rehabilitation efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
METHOD: One-hundred participants with a history of mild to severe TBI were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests assessing attention, executive functioning, memory, visual construction, motor functioning, and processing speed between 30 days and 5 years postinjury. An exploratory principal components analysis (PCA) was performed to determine which cognitive tests the RTLT was most highly associated with.
RESULTS: No difference in RTLT latency was present between mild and moderate/severe TBI. The PCA resulted in 5 factors. RTLT latency had a significant primary factor loading on the "processing speed" factor, and a secondary loading on the "motor" factor. Forty-two percent of participants had an impaired latency score.
CONCLUSIONS: RTLT latency appears to measure processing speed, and likely aspects of motor functioning, in our sample. The RTLT may be useful as a rapid assessment in individuals with a history of TBI to detect cognitive deficit before initiating further cognitive testing or rehabilitation efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).