MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.2015.18098

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2016

Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lee Christine H, Steiner Theodore, Petrof Elaine O, Smieja Marek, Roscoe Diane, Nematallah Anouf, Weese J Scott, Collins Stephen, Moayyedi Paul, Crowther Mark, Ropeleski Mark J, Jayaratne Padman, Higgins David, Li Yingfu, Rau Neil V, Kim Peter T

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major burden in health care and community settings. CDI recurrence is of particular concern because of limited treatment options and associated clinical and infection control issues. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising, but not readily available, intervention.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether frozen-and-thawed (frozen, experimental) FMT is noninferior to fresh (standard) FMT in terms of clinical efficacy among patients with recurrent or refractory CDI and to assess the safety of both types of FMT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

Randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial enrolling 232 adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, conducted between July 2012 and September 2014 at 6 academic medical centers in Canada.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive frozen (n = 114) or fresh (n = 118) FMT via enema.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution of diarrhea without relapse at 13 weeks and adverse events. Noninferiority margin was set at 15%.

RESULTS

A total of 219 patients (n = 108 in the frozen FMT group and n = 111 in the fresh FMT group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and 178 (frozen FMT: n = 91, fresh FMT: n = 87) in the per-protocol population. In the per-protocol population, the proportion of patients with clinical resolution was 83.5% for the frozen FMT group and 85.1% for the fresh FMT group (difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -10.5% to ∞]; P = .01 for noninferiority). In the mITT population the clinical resolution was 75.0% for the frozen FMT group and 70.3% for the fresh FMT group (difference, 4.7% [95% CI, -5.2% to ∞]; P < .001 for noninferiority). There were no differences in the proportion of adverse or serious adverse events between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults with recurrent or refractory CDI, the use of frozen compared with fresh FMT did not result in worse proportion of clinical resolution of diarrhea. Given the potential advantages of providing frozen FMT, its use is a reasonable option in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT01398969.

Для цитирования: Lee Christine H, Steiner Theodore, Petrof Elaine O, Smieja Marek, Roscoe Diane, Nematallah Anouf, Weese J Scott, Collins Stephen, Moayyedi Paul, Crowther Mark, Ropeleski Mark J, Jayaratne Padman, Higgins David, Li Yingfu, Rau Neil V, Kim Peter T. Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA. 2016. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18098.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.