Radiofrequency neurolysis in the management of inguinal neuralgia: preliminary study.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency (RF) neurolysis (RFN) in the management of refractory inguinal neuralgia.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Local institutional review board approval was obtained and written informed consent was waived. Twelve patients 26-75 years of age with chronic (>6 months) inguinal pain refractory to specific medication were included between 2005 and 2011. Data on patient demographics, clinical history, and pain management history were retrospectively assessed. Pain was measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 before and immediately after the procedure and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Diagnosis was always confirmed by a positive nerve block test result. Ambulatory CT-guided RF was the rule.
RESULTS
Sixteen RFN procedures were performed. Pain was present for an average of 3.2 years (range: 2-8 years) prior to initial RFN. Mean VAS score before the procedure was 7.75 of 10. Immediate pain relief of 100% was achieved in all patients. Pain reduction at 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up was statistically significant. Important pain reduction (≥80%) was obtained in 75% of RFN procedures at 6-month follow-up and in 50% of cases at 12 months. The mean duration of pain relief was 11.8 months after RFN, with a maximum average pain reduction of 84.5%. No complications were noted during or after the procedure.
CONCLUSION
RFN with CT guidance is an effective technique in the management of refractory inguinal pain with lasting satisfactory pain reduction; it may be considered as an alternative treatment to surgery. These results should be confirmed in a controlled trial with a larger series of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.