Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2011
Instrument validity and reliability of a choice response time test for subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: relationship with function.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Labruyère Rob, van Hedel Hubertus J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate instrument validity and reliability of a choice response time (CRT) test for the lower extremities in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). CRT in subjects with iSCI is hypothesized to be increased because of, for example, muscle weakness or increased corticospinal conduction velocity.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Spinal cord injury center of a university hospital in Switzerland.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients with iSCI (N=28; mean age, 51y; 57% men; neurologic level, C3-L5; median time since injury, 148d) compared with age-matched controls (50% men) to assess instrument validity by comparing CRTs. A subgroup of subjects with iSCI (n = 9) and controls (n = 13) to determine reliability.
INTERVENTION: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRTs of the lower extremity were assessed and divided into reaction and movement times. Additionally, subjects with iSCI were tested for lower-extremity muscle strength, gait capacity and mobility, independence, history of falls, and fear of falling.
RESULTS: CRTs in the control group (mean ± SD, 517 ± 71 ms) were significantly faster than those in the iSCI group (743 ± 177 ms; P<.001). Retest reliability was high in controls (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]>.98) and subjects with iSCI (ICC>.93). In subjects with iSCI, there were moderate to good correlations between CRT and several functional outcome measures, but not with reported number of falls.
CONCLUSION: Lower-extremity CRT testing appears reliable in healthy controls and ambulating subjects with iSCI.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Spinal cord injury center of a university hospital in Switzerland.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients with iSCI (N=28; mean age, 51y; 57% men; neurologic level, C3-L5; median time since injury, 148d) compared with age-matched controls (50% men) to assess instrument validity by comparing CRTs. A subgroup of subjects with iSCI (n = 9) and controls (n = 13) to determine reliability.
INTERVENTION: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRTs of the lower extremity were assessed and divided into reaction and movement times. Additionally, subjects with iSCI were tested for lower-extremity muscle strength, gait capacity and mobility, independence, history of falls, and fear of falling.
RESULTS: CRTs in the control group (mean ± SD, 517 ± 71 ms) were significantly faster than those in the iSCI group (743 ± 177 ms; P<.001). Retest reliability was high in controls (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]>.98) and subjects with iSCI (ICC>.93). In subjects with iSCI, there were moderate to good correlations between CRT and several functional outcome measures, but not with reported number of falls.
CONCLUSION: Lower-extremity CRT testing appears reliable in healthy controls and ambulating subjects with iSCI.