MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.022

Медицинская библиотека · Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2011

A double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of temporary endoscopic mucosal gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

Abell Thomas L, Johnson William D, Kedar Archana, Runnels J Matthew, Thompson Janelle, Weeks Ernest S, Minocha Anil, Griswold Michael E

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Endoscopically placed, temporary gastric electrical stimulation (tGES) may relieve symptoms of gastroparesis (Gp) and predict permanent gastric electrical stimulation (GES) outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To measure effects of 72 hours of temporary GES on Gp symptoms.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: From 2005 to 2006, we conducted a hospital-based, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of two consecutive, 4-day sessions (session 1 and session 2), enrolling 58 patients (11 males, 47 females; mean age 46 years) with GP symptom histories of three etiologies (idiopathic, 38; diabetes mellitus, 13; postsurgical, 7).

INTERVENTION: 72 continuous hours temporary GES was provided for group A during session 1, and for group B during session 2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Symptoms measured daily; gastric emptying, electrogastrography, and quality of life measured at baseline and session close.

RESULTS

In session 1, vomiting decreased in both groups, but was greater with stimulation, resulting in a day 3 difference of -1.02 (95% CI, -1.62 to -0.42; P < .001). Scores did not return to baseline during washout; on day 4, the difference persisted at -1.08 (95% CI, -1.81 to -0.35; P = .005). In session 2, vomiting slightly decreased with stimulation and slightly increased without it; at day 8, the nonactivated group had nonsignificantly greater vomiting, 0.12 (-0.68 to 0.92; P = .762). An overall treatment effect of a slight, nonsignificant daily decrease in average vomiting scores, -0.12 (-0.26 to 0.03; P = .116), was observed by pooling stimulation effects across sessions.

LIMITATIONS: Missing data; potential physiological imbalances between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall treatment effects were not significant, differences in favor of stimulation were suggested. Barriers to observing treatment effects included a decrease in vomiting for both groups during session 1, insufficient washout, and the absence of baseline vomiting for some patients. Future studies should better define inclusion criteria, use longer washout periods, randomize by etiology and baseline physiological findings, and pursue alternative designs. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 00432835.).

Для цитирования: Abell Thomas L, Johnson William D, Kedar Archana, Runnels J Matthew, Thompson Janelle, Weeks Ernest S, Minocha Anil, Griswold Michael E. A double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of temporary endoscopic mucosal gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.022.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.