MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181ff99be

Медицинская библиотека · Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2010

Visual field size criteria for mobility rehabilitation referral.

Lovie-Kitchin Jan E, Soong Grace P, Hassan Shirin E, Woods Russell L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate evidence-based visual field size criteria for referral of low-vision (LV) patients for mobility rehabilitation.

METHODS

One hundred and nine participants with LV and 41 age-matched participants with normal sight (NS) were recruited. The LV group was heterogeneous with diverse causes of visual impairment. We measured binocular kinetic visual fields with the Humphrey Field Analyzer and mobility performance on an obstacle-rich, indoor course. Mobility was assessed as percent preferred walking speed (PPWS) and number of obstacle-contact errors. The weighted kappa coefficient of association (κr) was used to discriminate LV participants with both unsafe and inefficient mobility from those with adequate mobility on the basis of their visual field size for the full sample and for subgroups according to type of visual field loss and whether or not the participants had previously received orientation and mobility training.

RESULTS

LV participants with both PPWS <38% and errors >6 on our course were classified as having inadequate (inefficient and unsafe) mobility compared with NS participants. Mobility appeared to be first compromised when the visual field was less than about 1.2 steradians (sr; solid angle of a circular visual field of about 70° diameter). Visual fields <0.23 and 0.63 sr (31 to 52° diameter) discriminated patients with at-risk mobility for the full sample and across the two subgroups. A visual field of 0.05 sr (15° diameter) discriminated those with critical mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that: practitioners should be alert to potential mobility difficulties when the visual field is less than about 1.2 sr (70° diameter); assessment for mobility rehabilitation may be warranted when the visual field is constricted to about 0.23 to 0.63 sr (31 to 52° diameter) depending on the nature of their visual field loss and previous history (at risk); and mobility rehabilitation should be conducted before the visual field is constricted to 0.05 sr (15° diameter; critical).

Для цитирования: Lovie-Kitchin Jan E, Soong Grace P, Hassan Shirin E, Woods Russell L. Visual field size criteria for mobility rehabilitation referral.. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181ff99be.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.