MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.036

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2008

Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas?

Ravichandran S, Ahmed H U, Matanhelia S S, Dobson M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Colovesical fistula is a devastating complication, usually secondary to diverticulitis or colon cancer. Imaging plays a crucial role in delineating the underlying anatomy and identifying an etiologic factor. Barium enema, computed tomography, and cystoscopy have been the mainstays of investigation, but they have less than ideal sensitivity and specificity. This study assessed the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the investigation of patients with probable colovesical fistulas.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients with presentations suspicious for enterovesical fistulas who underwent evaluation with axial T(1)-weighted and axial, coronal, and sagittal T(2)-weighted 1.5T MRI (body-phased array) were identified. Of the 22 patients, 19 underwent laparotomy and repair.

RESULTS

MRI correctly identified the presence of a fistula and defined the underlying etiology in 18 of 19 patients. Colovesical fistula was correctly excluded in 1 of 19 patients. The remaining 3 patients were either unfit for surgery or refused.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that MRI is an accurate method of evaluating patients with suspicion of colovesical fistulas, identifying the anatomy of the tract, as well as the etiology. This is not only useful for diagnosis, but also for surgical planning.

Для цитирования: Ravichandran S, Ahmed H U, Matanhelia S S, Dobson M. Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas?. Urology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.06.036.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.