MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1519/00139143-200612000-00005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001) · 2006

Validation of an item bank in a sample of community-dwelling survivors of a stroke.

Cook Chad, Goode Adam, Erb Daniel, Richardson Jan, Pietrobon Ricardo

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to validate an item bank of questions associated with activities of daily living (ADL), using graded item response theory (G-IRT), in a sample of community-dwelling survivors of a stroke.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 364 community-dwelling individuals who reported a recent history of stroke. Sixteen line items from the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) survey were analyzed using factor analysis, internal analyses of consistency, and G-IRT.

RESULTS

The 16 line items demonstrated unidimensionality and were internally reliable. Thirteen line items demonstrated good discrimination and suitable thresholds. The majority of items exhibited appropriate sensitivity across the entire spectrum of functional severity indicating that these items closely reflected the relationship of decreased function with increased severity of illness.

CONCLUSION

Each of the 13 items is scale independent, is valid for measurement of functional impairment, and may be applicable for use in a scale for assessment of functional change in community-dwelling stroke survivors.

Для цитирования: Cook Chad, Goode Adam, Erb Daniel, Richardson Jan, Pietrobon Ricardo. Validation of an item bank in a sample of community-dwelling survivors of a stroke.. Journal of geriatric physical therapy (2001). 2006. DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200612000-00005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.