[Parkinsonism and Camptocormia with focal spinal myopathy: case report and responsiveness to treatment].
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Camptocormia is characterised by extreme flexion of the thoracolumbar spine. It suffered an increase during walking and it is relieved in supine position. Camptocormia has been described in psychogenic disorders, but in other diseases, including Parkinson's disease as well. It has been recently described several cases with focal spinal myopathy, and we present a patient with this clinical association.
CASE REPORT: This 82-year-old man had a 6-year history of parkinsonian symptoms, mostly of rigid-akinetic type. He was in stage 4 on Hoehn & Yahr scale, and he had reached 62 points on Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale. Over the past 6-8 months, he developed progressive forward flexion of the trunk with clinical features of camptocormia. He suffered flogotic symptoms and signs on her lower back, and there were no dystonic posture or clinical features. Lumbar computerised tomography showed fat replacement of the paravertebral L3 muscles. A surgical paravertebral muscle examination and biopsy were performed, showing diffuse fat replacement and only a marginal myopathic focus. It was made several therapeutic approaches, with levodopa dose increase, reduction, fractioning, and addition of dopa-agonists. All of these strategies failed. It was determined to try a steroid course, but there were no improvement, so physiotherapy and rehabilitation measures did. He finally was confined to wheelchair.
CONCLUSIONS
Physiopathologic and therapeutic aspects of camptocormia in Parkinson's disease are unclear. Their relationship could be casual or causal. Patients with clear inflammatory myopathy could benefit from steroid therapy, but patients with end-stage myopathy probably do not so.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.