Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2005
Use of Malone antegrade continence enema in patients with perineal colostomy after rectal resection.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Portier Guillaume, Bonhomme Nicolas, Platonoff Ivan, Lazorthes Frank
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Abdominoperineal resection, with iliac colostomy, remains the gold standard treatment for very low-lying rectal cancer, but it alters patients' quality of life. Alternatives to iliac colostomy need to be experimented. Antegrade enemas via a cecal access (Malone operation) obtains a colonic emptying and improves continence for incontinent patients. Continence and quality of life after abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy associated to a Malone antegrade continence enema were studied.
METHODS: After abdominoperineal resection for cancer, 18 patients had a digestive reconstruction by perineal colostomy and Malone antegrade continence enema. Patients performed antegrade enemas every 24 to 48 hours with tap water. After six months, continence (Cleveland Clinic score) and quality of life (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale) were recorded.
RESULTS: Morbidity was 5 percent (1 appendix necrosis). All patients could perform antegrade enemas by themselves. Mean continence score was 6.41/20 (standard error, 2.31). Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores were: lifestyle 3.18/4 (standard error, 0.83); coping/ behavior 2.99/4 (standard error, 0.83); depression/self-perception 3.11/4 (standard error, 0.83); embarrassment 2.84/4 (standard error, 0.63).
CONCLUSIONS: After abdominoperineal resection, Malone antegrade continence enema associated to perineal colostomy provided an acceptable continence. It preserved patients' body image and resulted in a satisfying quality of life. It could become an alternative to iliac colostomy in selected patients.
METHODS: After abdominoperineal resection for cancer, 18 patients had a digestive reconstruction by perineal colostomy and Malone antegrade continence enema. Patients performed antegrade enemas every 24 to 48 hours with tap water. After six months, continence (Cleveland Clinic score) and quality of life (Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale) were recorded.
RESULTS: Morbidity was 5 percent (1 appendix necrosis). All patients could perform antegrade enemas by themselves. Mean continence score was 6.41/20 (standard error, 2.31). Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores were: lifestyle 3.18/4 (standard error, 0.83); coping/ behavior 2.99/4 (standard error, 0.83); depression/self-perception 3.11/4 (standard error, 0.83); embarrassment 2.84/4 (standard error, 0.63).
CONCLUSIONS: After abdominoperineal resection, Malone antegrade continence enema associated to perineal colostomy provided an acceptable continence. It preserved patients' body image and resulted in a satisfying quality of life. It could become an alternative to iliac colostomy in selected patients.